This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Education Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page needs a critical analysis or criticism section discussing the sources of the 21st Century Skills concepts. Most of the P21 partners benefit directly and commercially in perpetuating the idea that educational institutions must purchase their tech products. Matthew J. Bach (talk) 13:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC) Matthew J. Bach[reply]

Agree. It also needs more independent sources covering analysis and reception of the various reports and their skill concepts, instead of just having a trivial "Report X says Y" list based on primary information from the authors' own point of view. GermanJoe (talk) 13:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The core sentence "They are based on the premise that effective learning, or deeper learning, a set of student educational outcomes including acquisition of robust core academic content, higher-order thinking skills, and learning dispositions.", in the section The skills is incorrect: it lacks the main verb. Which is that premise on which 21st century skills are based? Just compare with this other sentence with the main verb in bold: "Instead, teachers encounter a fuzzy definition based on the premise that the flow of information enabled by digital technology and the interconnectedness of the global economy demands an innovative educational vision that endows students with the intellectual agility, flexibility, and creativity needed to succeed across various social and professional settings."^[1] Alvarosinde (talk) 11:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nelson 197.231.239.2 (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

need comments 197.231.239.2 (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]