Talk:2015 Singapore Grand Prix/GA1
GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Z105space (talk · contribs) 18:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Reviewing this article. Comments will appear soon. Z105space (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Background
- Link FIA to Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile
- Done
- Mention Pirelli are Formula One's sole tyre supplier.
- Done
- There should be information on the championship standings heading into the race.
- Added standings before the race section. Unfortunately, I couldn't find a clear archived standings link for the constructors' any date before the GP, so I added a link to the ESPN standings site, where the points are devided up clearly so that the points can be calculated together and prove the point. Added a similar section for after the race as well.
Free practice
- "Per the regulations for the 2015 season, three practice sessions were held; there were two 1.5-hour sessions on Friday and another one-hour session before qualifying on Saturday." Change 1.5-hour to 90 minute
- Done
- "The two Mercedes car" - You are missing the s in cars
- Done
- There are two mentions of the words "Manor Marussias" which should be changed to either Manor Marussia drivers or cars.
- Done
- Remove the worlds "Manor's newcomer" and "rookie" before the mentions of Rossi.
- Done
- You're missing "the" before "pit lane" and this should be done before the next four mentions of the word "pit lane".
- Done
Qualifying
- "both Force Indias and both McLarens" I feel it should be written as "both Force India and McLaren cars"
- Done
- Instead of writing Q2, it would be easier to write out the second part of qualifying so the non-racing expert will understand, but you may use the abbreviation as well.
- I've made this clearer by introducing the abbreviation at the beginning of the paragraph.
Race
- "However, his mechanics were able to mend the problem" - replace mend with rectify
- Done
- Delink Toro Rosso as it is already linked in an earlier sub-section.
- It was a link to the specific car, I took out the alternative title.
- Wikilink Virtual Safety Car.
- Done
- "Around the same time, Vettel was holding a five-second advantage over Ricciardo." While I understand what this means it would be better to re-worded this to "Around the same time, Vettel held a five-second advantage over Ricciardo"
- Done
- Remove the word "rookie" before Alexander Rossi's first mention here.
- Done
- "At the restart, Sainz, Jr. was caught out by his car being stuck in neutral, losing many places and dropping back to 18th position, but able to carry on." - Please specify how many positions Sainz lost and reword the last section of the sentence to but managed to continue.
- I changed the last part of the sentence, but since I do not know which position he was in before the restart (the source does not specify), I cannot give the number.
- You have Carlos Sainz called as "Sainz" or "Sainz, Jr." here and in the qualifying-sub section. Only one of these should be used throughout the article.
- Done Changed all to Sainz.
Post-race
- "Following the controversial refusal by Max Verstappen to follow team orders and let his teammate pass in the closing lap of the race," - replace "closing" with "final".
- Done
References
- References 1, 13, 47 (both formula1.com references) use Formula One Adminstration as their publisher, whereas References 9, 10, 11, 12 do not have a publisher, Reference 16 uses FOM and Reference 49 is simply FIA when the work should be formula1.com.
- Changed all publisher parameters to "Formula One World Championship Limited". Also archived all those references, since that website is often producing dead links after a while.
- Reference 3 redirects to a source page. Can you locate an archive link?
- Exchanged that ref with archived link.
- Reference 17 - ditto.
- Done
On hold until the nominator rectifies the above issues. Z105space (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Z105space: I think I've done everything now. Thank you once again for a good review :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:55, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Zwerg Nase: Good job. Promoting to GA class. :) Z105space (talk) 21:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)