Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:2014–2015 India–Pakistan border skirmishes

Indian military casualities

Warwar86 i noticed you removed the casualities of Indian army which i posted. Is there a reason why you are doing this. Read the news paper they are from Indian source. All of the incidents happened on different day and reported after a month, you can't that these sources are same. [[1]] happened on 22 july 2014. [[2]] happened on may 19, 2014. Zerefx (talk) 10:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

I have semi-protected the article for a week in hopes that cooler heads will prevail not only on the India-Pakistan border but also here at Wikipedia. For the record, it's not "balancing" to add "allegedly" to all claims about one side's behaviour but not the other's. Instead, this article would be benefitted by sources from outside India and Pakistan, such as The Guardian, The New York Times or ABC News. Those are less likely to be biased than Indian or Pakistani sources, which will tend to provide only a one-sided perspective. Huon (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good initiative on your part. These skirmishes and the Kashmir Issue in general are a very convenient way for politicians to shift public attention from more important, internal issues and get people riled up, arguing over the most useless piece of land in the world. So semi-protected is a good idea. Myopia123 (talk) 21:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani military casualties

User:Zerefx removed Pakistani military causalities providing reason that "no report of casualities of soldiers from Pakistan side is reported" but I believe India's media reports are not worthless. Pakistan military is used to to hide the truth about its casualties as usual. --Saqib (talk) 11:21, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saqib Saqib the person who has locked the article asked to provide links from less baised site likes guardian Uk, ABC news and others. And those sites also haven't reported on any thing like killing of soldiers on both sides. Now you can't say that Pakistani military is hiding or controls guardian uk or abc news channels. And also on Indian news channels the intelligence who is watching the casualities on Pakistan side claimed that they got the information from Pakistani media. But there is no news on Pakistani media. [[3]] Zerefx (talk) 11:42, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many reputable Indian newspapers identified as reliable sources, reported that as far as Pakistani military personals have been killed. I would like to have others opinion on this matter. --Saqib (talk) 12:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:saqib Okay. But Indian media also reported that only 8 civilians on Indian side and 11 on Pakistani side were killed. Even BSF also said that only civilians have been killed in recent ceasefire violation and not soldier [[4]] so how did it increase that much in a just a day or two. If it was massive violation then other international media would also had taken action like they did when 5 Indian and 4 Pakistani civilians were killed. International media also doesn't state any military personal death from both sides [[5]] . Indian media is also all not that correct like times of India reported that in 2013 ceasefire violation there were nine military casualties and six civilian deaths [[6]] .Mean while Pakistani media reported 14 civilian casualities and 10 military personals [[7]] so if we are going with Indian media and that Pakistan military hides casualities from their side then we should change the 2013 Indo Pak skrimishes Zerefx (talk) 13:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indian claims

There needs to be clear mention of the fact that Indian claims off so called "terrorists" etc killed are no verifiable these claims were not mentioned in other major sources only in Indian media and so it must be made clear India theorizes the number of dead Pakistan itself rejects these claims the article is turning into an Indian newspaper excerpt rather than a neutral article on the topic at hand. Krs1one (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then please get some pakistani sources to support your claims....just accusing that we use Indian sources won't help your cause a bit....the fact is that the pakistani government(you call it as Army) ordered the media of your country to stop publishing news about the issue..thats the reason why you won't find news about your military or civilian deaths.....and about the so called terrorists, that's what the sources say.....and they were killed crossing the border..so yeah, they are confirmed deaths... ƬheStrikeΣagle 01:51, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BTW remember that when you say the Indian sources are unverifiable, the same applies to Pakistani sources as well...the Indian media atleast provided images and proof of the civilian deaths while the Pakistani media hasn't.....this proves which is verifiable ƬheStrikeΣagle 01:51, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strike Eagle international sources also don't support facts of India media regarding killing of terrorist or any military personal. [[8]] [[9]] [[10]] so only Indian media is reporting those casualities. This will only make the article one sided. Kindly show international source that verify your claims regarding Pakistani media hiding it's casualities. Even UNMOGIP has visited Pakistan and Pakistan has showed it's casualities to them also [[11]] Zerefx (talk) 05:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The figures of Pakistani Rangers killed on 31 December

Well, the Pakistani officials have given the names of the two killed, Naik Riaz Shakir and Lance Naik Muhammad Safdar. In the country only two funeral prayers were carried out. So if there is no neutral source claiming that instead 4 soldiers were killed, the BSF claim that four Pakistani rangers were killed is invalid. Faizan 18:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to remove the BSF claim if no source is given which quotes someone else than BSF for "four Rangers killed". Faizan 18:58, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pakistanis better know how many of theirs were killed and in contrary to BSF claims,only two funeral prayers were offered. Faizan 19:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
2 funerals were offered doesn't necessarily mean only two of them are killed. We have enough sources to support BSF claim. We are just adding them as Indian claims. No problem with that atall. They are strongly sourced. ƬheStrikeΣagle 12:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have two neutral sources which confirm that 2 Pakistani and 1 Indian soldier was killed [[12]] [[13]] Zerefx (talk) 08:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which source to prove BSF claim? Any neutral source not quoting BSF officials? One by CNN did verify Pakistani claim but it was removed by someone. Faizan 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed with Zerefx, all sources other than BSF are giving the death toll as 2. I am going to remove the BSF claim if a neutral source is not given. After All, We have enough sources to support BSF claim. Faizan 15:43, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did you even read the neutral international sources that Zerefx provided? Both of them clearly mention that the death toll of both India and Pakistan were mentioned by the respective armed forces, rendering them just as effective as the sources I provided earlier. The Indian claim will stay as it is sufficiently sourced. ƬheStrikeΣagle 16:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, until the discussion here yields consensus, this version should stay whatsoever. I am considering third party comments, probably the other two killed were atheists as their funeral prayers were not offered. Faizan 16:29, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fine. Whether the two soldiers are atheists is none of our concern anyway. We may instead write like 6-8 killed which is more neutral IMO as it mentions both the ends. We have enough sources for both anyway. ƬheStrikeΣagle 16:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, only 6 were killed, as supported by majority of sources. Faizan 16:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The current version should stay, I am not going to remove the Indian claim till consensus here. Faizan 16:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)6 killed by Pakistani sources and international sources quoting Pak officials. 8 killed by Indian sources and international sources quoting Indian officials. ƬheStrikeΣagle 16:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So what? Did I remove Indian claim? The current version should stay. Both claims have already been adequately mentioned in the infobox. Faizan 16:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
arey yaar when did I oppose your proposal to let this version stay? I was answering to your statement that 6 was supported by majority of sources which is untrue. ƬheStrikeΣagle 16:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Separate articles for 2014 and 2015

I think we should start new article for 2015 as 2014 article is long enough. Your opinion?? -Nizil (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think length is the criterion for separate articles. We have separate articles for other years.e.g. 2011 and 2013 because those skirmishes took place and ended within that same year. But in this case, the fires are ongoing. Faizan 19:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption by Sumanta

This edit is contrary to the consensus above. Regarding the reference cited, The Hindu in the article says: "five Pakistani Rangers have been killed in the exchange of fire since Thursday", and it links this text to this link, which says only two Rangers were killed. Perhaps The Hindu needs to correct, either they should make it 5 in both articles, or 2 in both articles. Nevertheless, no Pakistani soldier's casualty has been reported in January. If there is not justification given and consensus achieved, the edit ought to be reverted. I suggested the user previously on my talk too, to discuss the figures first. Faizan 19:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup of Pakistan reacions

Can anyone translate this sentence for me? "The Pakistani Defence Minister, Khawaja Asif responded to the Indian counterpart on 'unafforable adventurism', "We don't want to convert border tension between two nuclear neighbours into confrontation".[48][82][83]"

I'm especially confused as so why tyhose sources were cited in particular, seeing as the first is a statement by the international Business Times that Pakistan had violated the ceasefire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.196.116.115 (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani dead edit war

While edit warring is not the way to go about it, Rajkumararslan is right about the number of dead Pakistani soldiers: The sources for the dead in July and August that Rajkumararslan removed and that OccultZone, Anupmehra and Strike Eagle re-added do not say those dead were soldiers, and in context it seems highly likely they were civilians ("killing one man and wounding two women and a child" - I think we can safely assume the women and the child are civilians; "At least two Pakistanis were killed and three others, including a woman, were injured" - again it seems likely the woman is a civilian; in neither case is a distinction between the obviously-civilians and any soldiers made). Huon (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, giving detailed rationale shortly. Faizan 19:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It seems obvious, the sources would never regards a soldier as a "Man/Person" which was killed. In fact, many sources would use the term "Martyr" for the soldiers killed. The facts are facts, some of the people from both sides always want the casualty count of the opponent side forcibly greater. Now, lets discuss the sources one by one, the first source was published on 21 July 2014. It says that "at least one person was killed and four others were injured". Upon searching the archives of the media, I found that the sources published on the same day say that the killed one was a farmer and four others were injured. For example, updated report of DAWN: A farmer was killed and four others, including three women, were injured, Pakistan Herald: Farmer killed by Indian firing in Sialkot, The Zimbabwe Herald: a civilian was killed, The Tribune: Truce violation: Civilian killed in ‘unprovoked Indian firing’, Daily Times: Pakistani civilian dies in Indian border fire. Now, the second source, which says: "two Pakistanis were killed and three others, including a woman, were injured". Upon searching the archives for this date, I found that only one casualty was reported by other sources and it was Nasreen Bibi, a civilian. For example, "A woman died and four villagers were injured, A woman was killed and four other civialians were injured by Indian troops, A woman died and four villagers were injured, A civilian was killed. Now, I expect at least Strike Eagle to reply, who considers a farmer and a civilian, Nasreen Bibi as Pakistani soldiers. I would also invite Anupmehra, Rajkumararslan and OccultZone to comment. Faizan 19:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, I'll make a comment. I made an edit seeing "removal of sourced contents" and I didn't knew I was wrong until my edits were undid. All posted above, a deep analysis of changes, I've had moments after revert of my edit (at least 24hrs before from now). If it was an edit-war from my part, I was supposed to make further edits what I didn't. One wrong edit -I didn't imagine would led me to the accusation of 'edit-warring'. Earlier I wanted to move on, but being pinged twice in here and have to therefore make a comment. What's this discussion about? Why is it being called an "edit-war"? Please do not answer. I don't wish to get involved in here. Thank you! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • These particular changes were made by Zerefx at first, who had edited a number of particular statistics without giving a reason. That's why his edits were being removed. He had also evaded with multiple IP addresses. When I reverted for the first time I thought about that again, until I had seen his message on my talk page.[14] OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 23:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption by Guptakings

This Guptakings user is making unconstructive edits there, requesting other users to stop him. He does not want to discuss anything, and so-far has produced edit-summaries like: "More ingo produced". Reported to ANI. Faizan 18:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Claims

So guys, we have got claims of 7 Indian soldiers and 4 Pakistanis being killed in January 2015. Neither of these figures were verified or supported by neutral sources. So a separate section "Claims" was made to include the claims made by the respective countries. Recently, a user shifted the claims for January to the main box. Reverted him. Faizan (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have tried to discuss it at his talk too. Faizan (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

I just spent a good half-hour cleaning up some blatant crimes against the English language. For those non-Native Anglo speakers, please ask for help when adding incidents. If you're worried that someone might not help you due to the nature of your post, then maybe you should step back and take a more neutral view of the conflict. I also removed some (more) politically-charged language designed to push a narrative. 65.209.62.115 (talk) 04:58, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good job all.

This page has been going fairly well over the past few months. A few scuffles over neutrality, but overall the article presents itself as very NPOV.65.209.62.115 (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sock farms

Many sock farms operate on this article. Recently, a new user, who edits through a mobile like others, made entry. In his first 3 edits, all to this article, he restores all of the disputed text that was inserted by the previous socks. I have reverted that edit and thought explaining it here would be a good idea. Firstly, 13 Indian soldiers have been killed, but Pakistan claims they killed another "four", making the total count "17". I explained in my earlier edit that ISPR first said that "3" civilians were killed but later on retracted that press release by saying that only two were killed, thus the Pakistani civilians murdered are "36". Moreover, only "Pakistan Rangers" is fighting the BSF and Pakistan Army is not involved directly. We have not included reasons for both Pakistanis and Indians killed, whether headshot, or shot in the neck, etc. Regards. Faizan (talk) 10:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this page should be pending changes protected or semi-protected. These days I'm busy on Tourism project, I need to check all news cited in this articles, people interpret news according their views. I generally don't revert these changes because I have not read news, blind reverting may end up in sanctions as it happened with some users recently. If you are not busy elsewhere then you check all news and write according to sources in best possible neutral way. Regards. --Human3015Send WikiLove  11:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The can of worms called "injuries"

Someone has put in mention of "injuries" into the article. I checked the last two edits from anon IP editors but they are not to blame. I am now removing this because if we start adding "injuries" it will open up a can of worms which will most likely result in a HUGE HUGE amount of edit wars and general bullshit. If any editor wishes to disagree please place your argument here before reverting my edits. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:22, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would read better if we remove ambiguous terms

The article uses a very large amount of terms which create uncertainty. Like saying "2 soldiers were killed by ALLEGED firing". This may seem a good idea when we are creating a NPOV article on two contested claims but here there is no required "weight" to add. This article is just a list of people killed. I am pinging a couple of editors who seem to be working here to see if it is all right to remove this kind of ambiguity. OccultZone, Faizan and Human3015 are hereby invited. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:07, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FreeatlastChitchat: Thanks for your concern in this issue. But there is ambiguity in this article because of issues related to "ceasefire violations". There is no question regarding firing but there has been questions regarding who started firing first. Media or authorities of both sides claims that other side has started firing first or other side violated ceasefire. Neutral foreign media also can't say anything on this issue as no one has actually seen who violated ceasefire first and reports of foreign media are also based on primary reports of either India or Pakistan. So there is ambiguity in the article and we can't write anything as sure. Regards. --Human3015Send WikiLove  06:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Human3015:I think using English as second language I have not been able to make myself clear lol. What I wanted to say was that we remove ambiguous terms when they are used in deaths. Like replacing "five indian soldiers were killed from alleged Pakistani gunfire" to "five indian soldiers were killed from pakistani gunfire". When there is a issue of who did what we can let it stay around , for example in the statement that Pakistani forces disabled an Indian drone we can let it say that Pakistani forces "claim to have" captured an Indian drone. My request is only about confirmed kills. I'll wait for some other comments than make a BOLD edit, perhaps it will be better in showing what I had in mind. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You can wait for more comments, but don't removed "injured" people from article, they are also equally important. Your only one chage was valid and I restored it after reverting you and I also added injured people according to source. Also don't remove rejection of "sweets" as it is indirectly related to skirmishes. We should write here every ceasefire violation by each party even if no one dies in it. This article is about ceasefire violations and it should be mentioned, we can't deny any incidence to add here just because few people injured in it and no one died in it. Regards. --Human3015Send WikiLove  06:43, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You have been reverted before on the injuries. that means at least one other person agrees with me. Please do not revert me again without seeking consensus. Giving "sweets" or rejecting them doesn't come under the term "skirmish" the last I checked. Were the sweets rejected with a fusillade of gunfire? FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Human3015:The reasons have already been explained on your talk page by at least one other editor. I was not able to go into much back history at your TP but the most recent is that you were told the reasons recently. So Please do not ask for reasons again and again. I'll restore your TP to the time when the reasons are visible to you just to make sure. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @FreeatlastChitchat: You are yet to provide valid reason for your claim, neither other editor has given any valid reason and he decided to not revert me. We need reasons for not including this. You have violated 3rr rule, I will lastly request you too self revrt yourself or I will report you on edit warring board. And do explain reasons to remove injuries here. Thank you. --Human3015Send WikiLove  07:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted twice, you have done the same. We should both let this go and wait for another editor to step in. If you want to revert me, feel free to go on a 3revert block. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • On which basis you are against including injuries? I'm not even biased, I'm adding civilians injured by both Indian and Pakistani forces, its not like that I'm taking any one side. And your reasons that "someone other also removed it" is not valid reason. Do you think that "injuries' are "minor' or "it is not "ceasefire violation"? Why it is not "ceasefire violation" if anyone injures in firing? Give answer of these questions. Moreover, many people lose their limbs, eyes in these attacks, later they don't able to do any job for livelihood because of their disability caused by firing, do you think "injuries" means just "minor abrasions"? Many people who reported as "injured" die after few months in hospital. Don't take injuries as minor thing. --Human3015Send WikiLove  07:58, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are looking for valid reasons? I gave them 3 days ago on your talk

Your revert on 2014–15 India–Pakistan border skirmishes is not justified. I knew it beforehand thus had explained it in my edit-summary. I am contributing to that article even before you registered. I know this does not entitle me to do unilateral changes but you should try to get to the simple point. These skirmishes are not new, they have caused immense life damage + injuries. We have not included injuries right from the "very beginning". I would give examples of the recent cases, when on August 4, two Pakistanis were killed and according to the reference, six were injured, we did not include "even those injured in the article" ". Latest example, when a woman was "critically injured" on 9 August, still we did not include it till today when she succumbed to the wounds. Regards. Faizan (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Faizan: Hi, It doesn't matters since when you are contributing to that article, and I see no logic behind ignoring "injured". That article is about skirmishes, not about deaths. We should mention any kind of skirmish whenever it happens. If Pakistan army or Indian army violates ceasefire and they injure some 100 civilians without any death then according to your logic we should not write that skirmish here. We must write all kind of skirmish. It doesn't matters how many people die or injured. The other incidences you mentioned should have been included too. There is no proper rationale behind why we should not include injured people. It is just your personal opinion. Thank you. --Human3015Send WikiLove  21:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I myself added those "injured" but I will not pursue another edit-war that you started there. Cheers. Faizan (talk) 18:53, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Faizan: If you want we can discuss this at talk page of the article. But it is quite clear issue, if either Indian army or Pakistan army violates ceasefire then it should be mentioned in that article. Rationale that "no one got killed in that violation, only some people got injured so no need to mention that violation" is not correct here. This applies to both sides. Article is about skirmishes/ceasefire violations.--Human3015Send WikiLove  19:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also not "taking any side", in fact I quoted the above examples of "Pakistanis being injured on a day and still not not being added here till they die in the ICUs". You should not make it a matter of ego. Ceasefire violations or the cross-border firing takes place everyday. "Today a skirmish took place with no one got killed and a few were injured"? Simply not that notable! Faizan (talk) 09:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you like to ping everybody even when you know they are watching that article? What is your definition of a "valid reason"? One that is a proponent of the nationalist views? I gave the examples of Pakistanis to make it clear that it is not a matter of nationality of those injured. Already explained above. Faizan (talk) 15:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Warning me with ownership? You cannot make unilateral changes without consensus. Faizan (talk) 17:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Faizan: What consensus you are talking about? Are you free to do unilateral changes? Other party was self-reverted himself but you again reverted it. What are your reasons for non-inclusion? Your reasons are "Because I'm not including injuries since starting so you also can't include injuries", "Sometime in past I have not added Pakistani civilians injured so you can't add it now". "XYZ number of people support me" etc etc. Is there any more reason that you have? Really, is there any other acceptable reason for your claims? --Human3015Send WikiLove  18:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am not making any unilateral change! And please get me straight, I have mentioned repeatedly above that "nationality" has nothing to do with the injured. I did not invite FreeatlastChitchat here. If he self-reverted, it does not mean he agrees to your one-sided changes. Faizan (talk) 18:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Again instead of specifying reasons you are making non-useful comments. --Human3015Send WikiLove  18:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 17 August 2015

In the Infobox

{{infobox military conflict | conflict = 2014–15 India–Pakistan border skirmishes | partof =[[Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts|Indo-Pakistani conflicts]]<br>and [[Kashmir conflict]] | image =[[File:Kashmir map.svg|300px]] | alt_text =Jammu and Kashmir locator map | caption =The Map of [[Line of Control]], 2014 | date ={{Start date|df=yes|2014|07|06}} – present<br>({{Age in years, months, weeks and days|month1=07|day1=06|year1=2014}}) | place =[[Line of Control]] and [[Indo-Pakistani border|International Border]] | coordinates = | map_type = | map_relief = | latitude = | longitude = | map_size = | map_marksize = | map_caption = | map_label = | territory = | status = Ongoing | combatants_header = | combatant1 ={{IND}} ---- {{army|IND}} * [[File:BSF Emblem.svg|20px]] [[Border Security Force|BSF]] | combatant2 ={{PAK}} ---- {{army|PAK}} * [[File:Pak Rangers.gif|20px]] [[Pakistan Rangers|Pak Rangers]] | commander1 =[[File:Flag of the President of India.svg|22px]] [[Pranab Mukherjee]]<br><sub>([[President of India]])</sub><br>[[File:Flag of Indian Army.svg|20px]] [[General|Gen.]] [[Dalbir Singh Suhag]]<br><small>([[Chief of Army Staff of the Indian Army|Chief of Army Staff]])</small><br>[[File:Flag of Indian Army.svg|20px]] [[Lieutenant General|Lt.Gen.]] D. S. Hooda<br><small>([[Northern Command|GOC-in-C, Northern Command]])</small><br>{{flagicon|India}} [[Rajnath Singh]]<br><sub>([[Minister of Home Affairs (India)|Minister of Home Affairs]])</sub><br>{{flagicon|India}} [[Manohar Parrikar]]<br><sub>([[Minister of Defence (India)|Minister of Defence]])</sub> | commander2 =[[File:Flag of the President of Pakistan.svg|22px]] [[Mamnoon Hussain]]<br><sub>([[President of Pakistan]])</sub><br>[[File:Flag of the Pakistani Army.svg|20px]] Gen. [[Raheel Sharif]]<br><small>([[Chief of Army Staff (Pakistan)|Chief of Army Staff]])</small><br>[[File:Flag of the Pakistani Army.svg|20px]] [[Lieutenant General|Lt.Gen.]] Kamar Javid<br><small>([[X Corps (Pakistan)|X Corps Commander]])</small><br>[[File:Flag of the Pakistani Army.svg|20px]] [[Major general|Maj.Gen.]] Khan Tahir Javid Khan<br><small>([[Director-general|DG Punjab Rangers]])</sub><br>{{flagicon|Pakistan}} [[Sartaj Aziz]]<br><sub>([[Foreign Minister of Pakistan|National Security Adviser]])</small><br>{{flagicon|Pakistan}} [[Nisar Ali Khan]]<br><sub>([[Interior Minister of Pakistan]])</sub> | units1 =[[File:IA Northern Command.jpg|15px]] [[Northern Command (India)|IA Northern Command]] | units2 = [[File:Flag of the Pakistani Army.svg|20px]] [[X Corps (Pakistan)|X Corps]]<br> [[File:Pak Rangers.gif|20px]] [[Pakistan Rangers|Punjab Rangers]] | units3 = | strength1 = | strength2 = | strength3 = | casualties1 = '''13 soldiers killed'''<ref name="The Economic Times">{{cite news|title=Congress hits out at government over ceasefire violations by Pakistan|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/congress-hits-out-at-government-over-ceasefire-violations-by-pakistan/articleshow/48118027.cms|quote=Accusing the Prime Minister of "failing" the country with respect to Foreign Policy, the Congress spokesman noted that there have been more than 800 ceasefire violations from Pakistani side, which has killed 12 soldiers and 18 civilians, in the past one year.|accessdate=17 July 2015|publisher=The Economic Times}}</ref> *<small>1 killed in May 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Sepoy Bhikale Uttam Balu of the 2 Maratha Light Infantry (MLI) was killed in an attack along the LoC in Akhnoor.|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/ceasefire-violation-again-army-jawan-killed-two-others-injured-in-pak-firing-along-loc/|publisher=indiaexpress}}</ref> *<small>2 killed in July 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Army Jawan Killed in Pakistani Firing Along LoC|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/Army-Jawan-Killed-in-Pakistani-Firing-Along-LoC/2014/07/22/article2343605.ece|accessdate=22 July 2014|publisher=newindiaexpress}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=One BSF jawan dead in Pak firing|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/One-BSF-jawan-dead-three-injured-in-Pak-firing/articleshow/38478589.cms|accessdate=16 July 2014|publisher=TimeofIndia}}</ref> *<small>1 killed in Nov 2014</small><ref name="Ibn live">{{cite news|title=civilian and a soldier killed as Pakistani troops target Indian positions along LoC in Kashmir|url=http://m.ibnlive.com/news/jk-soldier-civilian-dead-as-pakistan-violates-ceasefire-in-uri-sector/511519-3-245.html|accessdate=8 November 2014|publisher= Ibn live}}</ref><ref name="Deccan Chronicle"/> *<small>1 killed in Dec 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Pak violates ceasefire in J&K's Samba, one BSF jawan killed in firing|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pak-violates-ceasefire-in-JKs-Samba-one-BSF-jawan-killed-in-firing/articleshow/45702062.cms|publisher=timeofindia}}</ref> *<small>3 killed in Jan 2015</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Pakistan firing kills 2 Army jawans, one woman; triggers migration|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/pakistan-firing-kills-2-army-jawans-one-woman-triggers-migration/?SocialMedia|publisher=IndianExpress}}</ref><ref name="TOI1">{{cite news|title=Pakistani Rangers violate ceasefire again, kill BSF jawan|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pakistani-Rangers-violate-ceasefire-again-kill-BSF-jawan/articleshow/45760195.cms|date=5 January 2015|work=Times of India|accessdate=5 January 2015}}</ref> *<small> 3 killed in July 2015</small><ref name="NIE"/><ref name="focus"/><ref name="rachpal"/> ---- '''25 civilians killed'''<ref name="The Economic Times"/> *<small>2 killed in Aug 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=BSF claims two indian civilians died in firing by pakistani troops|url=http://74.205.74.128:88/DisplayDetails.aspx?ENI_ID=11201408240308&EN_ID=11201408240110&EMID=11201408240046|accessdate=24 August 2014|publisher=ExpressTribune}}</ref> *<small>10 killed in Oct 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Pakistani forces shelled the village of Arnia about three km from the border , killing five.|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1136563/india-pakistan-skirmish-at-loc-kills-9-civilians|accessdate=6 October 2014|publisher=Dawn.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Teenaged girl killed in Pak shelling near border|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/pakistani-troops-violate-ceasefire-on-third-successive-day/|accessdate=3 October 2014|publisher=IndianExpress}}</ref><ref name="Time of India">{{cite news|title=2 killed in fresh Pak firing in J&K, India asks troops to retaliate strongly|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/2-killed-in-fresh-Pak-firing-in-JK-India-asks-troops-to-retaliate-strongly/articleshow/44682801.cms|publisher=Time of India}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=2 woman killed in fresh Pakistan firing overnight|url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/pakistan-continues-to-violate-ceasefire-two-women-killed-in-overnight-firing_1481832.html}}</ref> *<small>1 killed in Nov 2014</small><ref name="Ibn live"/><ref name="Deccan Chronicle">{{cite news|title=17-year-old girl, soldier killed as Pakistani troops target Indian positions along LoC in Kashmir|url=http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141108/nation-current-affairs/article/17-year-old-girl-soldier-killed-pakistani-troops-target-indian|date=8 November 2014|work=Deccan Chronicle|accessdate=8 November 2014}}</ref> *<small>1 killed in Jan 2015</small><ref>{{cite news|title= 1 civilian dead, several hurt as Pakistani troops target villages, border posts along IB|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/5-pak-rangers-killed-as-india-foils-major-infiltration-bid-along-ib/article1-1302828.aspx}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title= Pakistan violated border ceasefire 685 times in eight months, says government|url=http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Pakistan-violated-border-ceasefire-685-times-in-eight-months-says-government/articleshow/46362942.cms |accessdate=25 February 2015 |publisher=Times of India}}</ref> *<small>2 killed in Jul 2015</small><ref name="ECOT">{{cite news|title=Pakistani rangers injure 2 BSF jawans, kill 2 Indian civilians; BSF told to show restraint|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pakistani-rangers-injure-2-bsf-jawans-kill-2-indian-civilians-bsf-told-to-show-restraint/articleshow/48092213.cms|date=15 July 2015|work=The Economic Times|accessdate=15 July 2015|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6a3FH8cgy|archivedate=15 July 2015}}</ref> *<small>7 killed in Aug 2015</small><ref name="TIE"/><ref name="HT"/><ref>{{cite news|title=J-K: 1 more dead in Pakistan firing along LoC, toll rises to 6|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/j-k-many-casualties-as-pakistan-violates-ceasefire-along-loc-in-poonch/article1-1380613.aspx|publisher=Hindustan Times|date=16 August 2015}}</ref> ---- '''Pakistani Claims'''<br>17 Soldiers killed *<small>7 killed in Jan 2015</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Rangers reciprocate Indian firing at LoC killing 5 soldiers|url=http://dunyanews.tv/index.php/en/Pakistan/253559-Rangers-reciprocate-Indian-firing-at-LoC-killing-5|publisher=Dunya News}}</ref><ref name="Nation.com">{{cite news|title=Indian shelling in Zafarwal, Shakargarh sectors kills 4 civilians, five Indian troops were also killed in exchange of fire|url=http://nation.com.pk/national/06-Jan-2015/indian-shelling-in-zafarwal-shakargarh-sectors-kills-4-civilians|publisher=Nation.com}}</ref> *<small>1 drone destroyed</small><ref name="Express Tribune">{{cite news|title=Pakistan Army shoots down Indian 'spy drone'|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/921413/pakistan-army-shoots-down-indian-spy-drone/|publisher=Express Tribune}}</ref><ref name="Dawn News">{{cite news|title=Pakistan military shoots down Indian 'spy drone'|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1194644/pakistani-military-shoots-down-indian-spy-drone|publisher=Dawn News}}</ref> | casualties2 ='''6 soldiers killed''' *<small>3 killed in Oct 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=three Jawans of the Chenab Rangers were killed and more than 38 people were injured seriously by unprovoked intensified heavy shelling on Sialkot border villages by Indian BSF during the month of October 2014.|url=http://nation.com.pk/national/01-Dec-2014/govt-urged-to-boldly-reply-to-indian-madness|publisher=The Nation}}</ref> *<small>1 killed in Nov 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Indian firing at LoC kills Pakistani soldier|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/794722/indian-firing-at-loc-kills-pakistani-soldier/|publisher=Express Tribune}}</ref> *<small>2 killed in Dec 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title= 2 Pakistan rangers killed in ceasefire violation by Indian BSF|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/815072/two-rangers-personnel-injured-as-indian-bsf-resort-to-unprovoked-firing-in-shakargarh/|publisher=Express Tribune}}</ref> ---- '''40 civilians killed''' *<small>2 killed in July 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=one person was killed in Shakargarh sector and a man was killed in Mirajke.|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/771722/indian-army-violates-loc-ceasefire-in-jandrot-sector-ispr/|publisher=ExpressTribune}}</ref><ref name="dawn.com">{{cite news|title=One Pakistani killed, three wounded during Indo-Pak border clash|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1120463/one-pakistani-killed-three-wounded-during-indo-pak-border-clash|agency=DAWN news|date=21 July 2014}}</ref> *<small>2 killed in Aug 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Two civilians killed by indian firing in sialkot sector|url=http://74.205.74.128:88/DisplayDetails.aspx?ENI_ID=11201408240308&EN_ID=11201408240110&EMID=11201408240046|accessdate=24 August 2014|publisher=ExpressTribune}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite news|title=Two Pakistanis killed, four Indians wounded in exchange of fire along border|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1124645|agency=DAWN news}}</ref> *<small>16 killed in Oct 2014</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Four civilians, including two children and a woman, were killed on the first day of Eidul Azha|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1136563/india-pakistan-skirmish-at-loc-kills-9-civilians|accessdate=6 October 2014|publisher=Dawn.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=1 woman killed, 2 injured as Indian army resorts to 'retaliation' in Charwa sector|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/772134/1-woman-killed-2-injured-as-indian-army-resorts-to-unprovoked-firing-in-charwa-sector/|accessdate=7 October 2014|publisher=ExpressTribune}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=8 people kiled in chaprar sector due to cross border firing by indian army|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/772176/two-dead-as-indian-forces-violates-ceasefire-near-sialkot-working-boundary/|publisher=ExpressTribune}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Two Pakistanis killed in firing by indian army|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/772713/two-killed-12-injured-on-pakistani-side-of-loc/|publisher=Express Tribune}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Fresh Indian firing across LoC kills 70-year-old|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/782690/fresh-indian-firing-across-loc-kills-one/|publisher=ExpressTribune|date=28 October 2014}}</ref> *<small>5 killed in Jan 2015</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Girl dies as India violates LoC ceasefire|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/816524/girl-dies-as-india-violates-loc-ceasefire/|publisher=expresstribune}}</ref><ref name="Tribune1">{{cite news|title=Ceasefire violation: Four civillians killed as Indian aggression shows no sign of abating|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/817074/ceasefire-violation-india-continues-firing-shelling-in-shakargarh/|date=5 January 2015|work=The Express Tribune|accessdate=5 January 2015}}</ref> *<small>1 killed in Feb 2015</small><ref>{{cite news|title=Sixty-year-old man killed in Indian firing at LoC|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/1163578/sixty-year-old-man-killed-in-indian-firing-at-loc|publisher=Dawn News}}</ref> *<small>1 killed in May 2015</small> *<small>6 killed in Jul 2015</small><ref name="TEP1"/><ref name="Wasim"/> *<small>7 killed in Aug 2015</small> <ref name="TOI2"/><ref name="Hillan"/><ref name="Jandrot"/><ref name="thenews1">{{cite news|title=Indian firing across LoC kills one woman; husband, daughters injured|url=http://www.thenews.com.pk/article-194215-Indian-firing-across-LoC-kills-one,-injures-three-Pakistanis-|publisher=The News|date=14 August 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Unprovoked Indian firing along LoC kills one, injures three: ISPR|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/938686/unprovoked-indian-firing-along-loc-kills-one-injures-three-ispr/|publisher=Express Tribune|date=15 August 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Woman killed, eight injured in fresh Indian firing along LoC|url=http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2015/08/17/national/woman-killed-eight-injured-in-fresh-indian-firing-along-loc/|publisher=Pakistan Today|date=16 August 2015}}</ref> ---- '''Indian Claims'''<br> 17 soldiers killed *<small>12 killed in Oct 2014</small><ref name=theeconomictimes>{{cite news|last1=Aman Sharma|title=12 Pakistan rangers killed in recent firing between the troops along the border: Border Security Force|url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-10-14/news/55014334_1_bsf-pakistan-army-border-security-force|accessdate=8 January 2015|work=The Economic Times|date=14 October 2014}}</ref> *<small>5 killed in Jan 2015</small><ref name="Indian Express">{{cite news|title=Pak desperate for talks with India after 5 Pak soldiers killed by Indian Army|url=http://www.defencenews.in/defence-news-internal.aspx?id=l$$LLCDeoVVQ=|publisher=Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Five dead in New Year's Eve clashes on India-Pakistan border|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/815596/five-dead-in-new-years-eve-clashes-on-india-pakistan-border/|publisher=The Express Tribune}}</ref> | notes = | campaignbox ={{Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani Wars}} }}

Rajkumararslan (talk) 11:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC) [reply]

For "August (2015)"

====August==== * {{flagicon|PAK}} – On 4 August, two Pakistani civilians were killed in BSF fire on Pakistani residential areas near Sukhial village along the Working Boundary near Sialkot. The killed included 14 years old Atif and 22 years old Muhammad Adnan.<ref name="Atif">{{cite news|title=Two killed in Indian BSF firing near Sialkot: ISPR|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/931973/five-injured-as-india-violates-ceasfire-near-sialkot-ispr/|date=August 4, 2015|work=The Express Tribune|accessdate=August 4, 2015|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6aXJhYPv5|archivedate=August 4, 2015}}</ref><ref name="TOI2">{{cite news|title=Pakistan claims 2 killed in firing by Indian troops|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Pakistan-claims-2-killed-in-firing-by-Indian-troops/articleshow/48348186.cms|date=August 4, 2015|work=Times of India|accessdate=August 4, 2015|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6aXJpF5TQ|archivedate=August 4, 2015}}</ref> * {{flagicon|IND}} – On 4 August, one civilian, Sanjey Kumar was killed by Punjab Rangers fire at 12 BSF outposts in Kanachak and Pargwal sectors of Jammu district.<ref name="TIE">{{cite news|title=Ceasefire violation: One killed as Pak Rangers target 17 BOPs, villages in Jammu|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/ceasefire-violation-pak-rangers-target-12-bops-with-mortar-bombs/|date=August 4, 2015|work=The Indian Express|accessdate=August 4, 2015|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6aXKq3Cj7|archivedate=August 4, 2015}}</ref><ref name="HT">{{cite news|title=Pakistan violates ceasefire again, one civilian killed|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pakistan-violates-ceasefire-again-targets-12-bsf-posts/article1-1376194.aspx|date=August 4, 2015|work=Hindustan Times|accessdate=August 4, 2015|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6aXL2abio|archivedate=August 4, 2015}}</ref> * {{flagicon|PAK}} – On 7 August, Indian toy bomb killed a child at Hillan Sector, [[Muzaffarabad]].<ref name="Hillan">{{cite news|title=Indian toy bomb killed a child and injured two|url=http://www.thenewstribe.com/2015/08/09/indian-bsf-continue-ceasefire-violation-along-loc-ispr/|publisher=The News Tribe}}</ref> * {{flagicon|PAK}} – On 9 August, a woman was critically injured by BSF fire on Pakistani residential areas in Jandrot sector along LOC.<ref>{{cite news|title=Woman critically injured by Indian firing|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/935227/woman-critically-injured-by-indian-firing/|date=Aug 10, 2015|work=The Express Tribune|accessdate=Aug 11, 2015|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6ahXKqwz5|archivedate=Aug 11, 2015}}</ref> The 28 years old Fareeda belonged to [[Kotli]],[[Azad Kashmir]] and was being treated in the [[Combined Military Hospital]], [[Rawalpindi]], where she died on 11 August.<ref name="Jandrot">{{cite news|title=Pakistani woman injured by Indian cross-border firing dies at hospital|url=http://www.thenews.com.pk/article-193880-Pakistani-woman-injured-by-Indian-cross-border-firing-dies-at-hospital-|date=Aug 11, 2015|work=The News|accessdate=Aug 11, 2015|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6ahWxVuvt|archivedate=Aug 11, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Indian firing: Woman succumbs to injury at CMH Rawalpindi|url=http://thefrontierpost.com/article/325526//|date=Aug 11, 2015|work=The Frontoer Post|accessdate=Aug 11, 2015|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6ahY2GjiU|archivedate=Aug 11, 2015}}</ref> * {{flagicon|PAK}} – On 14 August, the day of Independence of Pakistan, one woman, Muneera Akhtar, was killed by Indian army firing in Nezapir sector.<ref name="thenews1"/> * {{flagicon|PAK}} – On 15 August, one civilian, Muhammad Shafi, was killed in cross border firing along LoC in [[Kotli]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Unprovoked Indian firing along LoC kills one, injures three: ISPR|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/938686/unprovoked-indian-firing-along-loc-kills-one-injures-three-ispr/|publisher=Express Tribune|date=15 August 2015}}</ref> * {{flagicon|IND}} – On 15 August, the day of Independence of India, 5 Indian civilians were killed in cross border firing along LoC.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/civilians-killed-in-firing-by-pakistani-troops-in-poonch/1/458849.html |title=On Independence Day, 3 civilians killed in Pakistani firing : Jammu and Kashmir, News – India Today |publisher=Indiatoday.intoday.in |date=|accessdate=2015-08-15}}</ref> * {{flagicon|IND}} – On 16 August, a woman was killed by Punjab Rangers fire in Poonch district along LOC.<ref>{{cite news|title=J-K: 1 more dead in Pakistan firing along LoC, toll rises to 6|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/j-k-many-casualties-as-pakistan-violates-ceasefire-along-loc-in-poonch/article1-1380613.aspx|date=Aug 16, 2015|work=Hindustan Times|accessdate=Aug 17, 2015|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6aqurPODI|archivedate=Aug 17, 2015}}</ref> * {{flagicon|PAK}} – On 17 August, a woman was killed by Indian fire in Nakyal sector along LOC.<ref>{{cite news|title=Woman killed, eight injured in fresh Indian firing along LoC|url=http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2015/08/17/national/woman-killed-eight-injured-in-fresh-indian-firing-along-loc/|date=Aug 17, 2015|work=Pakistan Today|accessdate=Aug 17, 2015}}</ref>

@Ser Amantio di Nicolao: - As you have made an edit after the article got protected, requesting you to answer this edit-request. Above are changes involving the death-count. Below are some updates in the text in the sub-section "August (2015)" Faizan (talk) 15:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ser Amantio di Nicolao: You can see in recent edit war one party was involved in removing "number of injured" persons from the article for no reason. You can read above discussion for their reasoning behind it. I request you to restore persons injured in these skirmishes. Other party has not given any valid policy based reason and their comments reflects personal perception of this problem. If you see the version that I was restoring has injured people from both India and Pakistan, it is not even biased version. One party just don't want to write injured person for no reason, they also claims that if in any skirmishes people don't die and only gets injured then we should not write that skirmish here, "people must die" is the pre-condition they have established here. This should be noted as this article is under discretionary sanctions. --Human3015Send WikiLove  16:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will take a look shortly at updating the article, and will let you know when I have done so. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the edits requested - please take a look and ensure that everything is as it should be. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Sir! Faizan (talk) 20:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ser Amantio di Nicolao - Sir, the infobox was fine, but the section "August" needs to be recopied from here (Open the edit-box first, then copy). Faizan (talk) 20:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed it. There's more information below which I will incorporate shortly, but I wanted to get the first edit out of the way. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 18 August 2015

Pakistani civilians causalities from 15 to 16 august are 3,so there are 8 civilians killed in the month of August. please edit the civilians causalities numbers 41 from 40.[1] on August 18, one more civilian was killed by indian firing.the total number civilians killed are 42, now. [2] Rajkumararslan (talk) 14:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "ceasefire violations on 15 to 16 August, by Indian troops at the Line of Control in Kotli Sector, which resulted in the martyrdom of three civilians – Shafi Khan, 55, Shahpal Khan, 56 and Sara Khatoon". Express Tribune.
  2. ^ "One killed, 3 civilians injured in latest LoC violations by Indian forces". Dunya News. 18August 2015. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
Not done: The page's protection level and/or your user rights have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. --Redrose64 (talk) 07:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 20 August 2015

Add Name of NSA of India Ajit Kumar Doval in the chart list of belligerents

Ravikantc (talk) 10:34, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level and/or your user rights have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. --Redrose64 (talk) 07:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From 8 to 11

For about a week, the same IP range is changing the figures of 8 Pakistanis killed on 28 August 2015 to 11 killed. Never uses an edit-summary, latest one. Previous edits: [15][16], etc. Please stop and discuss your changes prior to re-changing that without consensus. The updated sources say a total of 11 were killed which included 3 Indians and 8 Pakistanis, whereas you cannot get to the simple point that not all of the 11 killed on that day were Pakistanis. Faizan (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by EkoGraf

EkoGraf Please don't merge those sections again. This conflict is a bit different than the conflicts in Syria or elsewhere because this is an India-Pakistan match. We simply cannot afford losing it.[sarcasm] The media in this region is pretty nationalistic, thus we created separate sections for both "Indian and Pakistani claims". A country's media claims of killing 5 soldiers from the opposite side, but the opposite side rejects these claims. Then what can we do? This created several conflicts in the past when the opposing side quoting their media added +5 soldiers killed in the infobox. Thus these separate sections are required. In the main sections, onky those casualties are taken into account which have been confirmed by the country to which those killed soldiers belong. Here, we need separate headings for civilians too, as killing a soldier in a conflict is different from killing a civilian. Pakistanis claimed to have destroyed an Indian drone, that was too included in the "Pakistani claims". Regards, Faizan (talk) 12:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First, I repeat what I said in the edit summary - The day-by-day, month-by-month listing of casualties in the infobox is highly redundant and un-encyclopidic. Not to mention it convalutes the infobox unnecessarily. We don't list individual deaths month-by-month in ANY of the other conflict infoboxes anywhere on Wikipedia in this manner. Only totals. Which is what I did. Your month-by-month figures still exist but in single-reference form, at the end giving a sourced total. (This is my main issue and I hope we can resolve it) Second, I took into account both sides claims and did not reject one over the other, but the difference between the two is still there, that's why there are a lower and an upper estimate for all of the fatalities. That way, we are in essence including both the Indian and Pakistani claims, and sticking to neutrality as Wikipedia requests from us and presenting both sides POV. As for the drone, you can reinsert it if you want, I don't mind. If you still want day-by-day and month-by-month fatalities to be listed for readers, than the proper course of action is to create an article similar to List of Taliban fatality reports in Pakistan or List of Afghan security forces fatality reports in Afghanistan where a more comprehensive look into the casualties is presented. The infobox is reserved for full totals only. Regards. EkoGraf (talk) 23:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
PS If you want to separate casualties claimed by India from those claimed by Pakistan I have no objections, we can discuss this on a proper encyclopidic way to do it in the infobox, but not again writing month-by-month fatalities, unless its in single-reference form like I presented. EkoGraf (talk) 23:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I made a compromise edit, I added the drone back and separated Indian from Pakistani claims. Hope that will be sufficient. Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 01:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@EkoGraf:, well, it looks OK now. Good Job. I never disputed the monthly counts and I have no problem with their removal. I noted that the unconfirmed media "claims" should not be presented as facts. Cheers. Faizan (talk) 07:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality Needs to be verified Adding "POV"

Most of the recent sources are added by one individual Mar4d and sources refer to local news channels/media outlets whose credibility is questionable owing to bias opinions. --Dude7190 (talk) 20:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yes your right. I'm not to much experienced user so I can't understand what to do. But understand users try to push biases into the article. Kautilya3 pls check the page & it's recent edits. Spartacus! t@lk 05:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of article

I believe that this article should not include the 29 September 2016 event as it is unrelated with the rest of the article. Calling it "2014–Present" is a distortion of the events.

On 13 February 2016‎, User:Baking Soda moved this article from 2014–15 India–Pakistan border skirmishes to India–Pakistan border skirmishes (2014–present) citing "to reflect present, incident happened today". During my inspection of the article on 21 September 2016‎, I found no evidence of any current India-Pakistan conflicts that are related to the continuous skirmishes that lasted every month from 6 July 2014 to 2 November 2015 as per the article. Thus the title was changed to reflect the article.

On 29 September 2016‎, User: Mar4d moved it back stating that "skirmishes are still continuing". Can Mar4d prove that the 2016 India–Pakistan military confrontation of 29 September 2016 is at all related to the continuous skirmishes that lasted every month from 6 July 2014 to 2 November 2015? Filpro (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:India–Pakistan border skirmishes (2019) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2014%E2%80%932015_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_border_skirmishes