Talk:2012 Fatah–Hamas Cairo Agreement
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anguye48, G erika, Lrichar, Jmcdona23. Peer reviewers: Bholmes 2.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Why 2012
The reason to put 2012 is because there was another Palestinian agreement in Cairo in 2011.GreyShark (dibra) 22:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Good Start, Needs Expansion
You all have a good start to the article, it just needs to be expanded upon. In the Leader, maybe place the "signed in May 2012 in Cairo Egypt" into a separate sentence. I feel that will bring clarity to the very first sentence. Either in the Background section on a separate section, add more details about how/why the accord failed. Overall, this article piques my interest and possesses no bias. The facts ae presented in the same style as an encyclopedia. An image of a map showing where the Gaza Strip and the Palestinian National Authority are located will spruce the article up. Keep up the good work! Rcelenta (talk) 19:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
More Background Information
I am still a bit confused about the content of the article. I think you can expand more on the information and break down the concepts into smaller parts. The article states information that the reader might not have previous knowledge on. Try breaking down this information in order to express the data more clearly. You can also expand on the background to further introduce the agreement and back up the information from credible sources. The organization of the article works well and helps separate the elements of the agreement. Nolachic101 (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
This article is a little vague. What you have here is good but unsatisfying. What exactly is this agreement? What does it mean for the people? Who is responsible for making sure that the agreement was held up? Maybe try doing a little more research on the topic. Getting a better understanding of what is going on with it. Bholmes 2 (talk) 00:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
the article had a strong start but the more one read into it, it became repetitive and more over it didn't give much insight about the people the agreement would effect. more research needs to be conducted in order for this article to be made better. when doing research think of it as you looking for evidence or sources the would help you write your own paper. Zholly (talk) 01:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC) zholly