This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Socialism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Zanhe Hi dear user! I have an English version source for the 1st National Congress of the Communist Party of China, maybe you can try considering to add the source into the article too. SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to revert the recent undiscussed move pending the result of any future votes here: Talk:Chinese Communist Party. SilverStar54 (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in favor of the move initiated by @dotacal. I think the reasons "Chinese Communist Party" should be moved to "Communist Party of China" weigh even more in favor of a move for an article on a specific Party Congress. It makes even more sense to use the correct formulation of the party's name. JArthur1984 (talk) 23:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You probably should check Talk:Chinese Communist Party first. - Amigao (talk) 00:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]