This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums Polynesia: Tuvalu Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tuvalu (assessed as Low-importance). Micronesia: Kiribati This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Kiribati.

Sorry for adding an unnecessary hyphen to ex officio. But I have seen that hyphen in Whitehall texts and essays. But I am always surprised that any small change I make is immediately reverted. It always remembers me that I am not always wrong — as for the first Resident Commissioner of GEI.--Arorae (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I check any edits that appear on my watchlist and fix any that introduce something incorrect or problematic; it's nothing to do with who is making the edits. This was the 19th article today that I reverted some kind of change on. Number 57 19:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]