This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
1961 Southern Rhodesian constitutional referendum is within the scope of WikiProject Zimbabwe, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Zimbabwe and Zimbabwe-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.ZimbabweWikipedia:WikiProject ZimbabweTemplate:WikiProject ZimbabweZimbabwe
Not strictly correct. Southern Rhodesia never stopped anybody from voting because of his colour; the small number of black voters was because of qualifications on the voters' roll, which applied to everybody whether he was black, white, green or purple. Most blacks did not reach these, and many who did boycotted, so the black share of the electorate was proportionally very small. I've put a bit in the article briefly explaining this, I hope it helps. —Cliftonian(talk)12:20, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unofficial referendum
The unofficial one, was that also in in Southern Rhodesia? If yes, the original source is not correct, and I should request this website to be corrected...--Antemister (talk) 12:00, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]