This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chess Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Years Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1. Find more sources. Currently the article relies on a single source, Chess Review, Vol. 1, No. 1. Burgess should help.

Sadly Burgess gives very little - The London and Berne tournament outcomes and a further Spielmann match (which I'll add). Otherwise he just gives some standout game positions/combinations from these events and the dismissive note - "With the great depression at its height, it is a year of few major tournaments". Brittle heaven (talk) 22:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. Include some Soviet chess. 1932 probably wasn't a big chess year in the USSR, but because of #1 the page has a Western bias.
2. Make sure we cover all the 1932 events found on List of strong chess tournaments.
3. Consider adding all national champions we can find for 1932. It might be best to add them as a table.

Quale (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1932 in chess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090102210932/http://www.rogerpaige.me.uk/tables3.htm to http://www.rogerpaige.me.uk/tables3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]