This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted from this draft on 26 May 2022 by reviewer HenryTemplo (talk · contribs). Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance). London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Evening Standard article mentions that the W12/12World rivals posted a song that included the lyrics "Wit 2 shanks up, creep up like luga/Leave man cut, now the 12s all hot" (edited for grammar); looking these lyrics up on Google links to "No Hook" by 1011. For some reason, the title of the song/name of the group wasn't included in the article; I'm assuming this was due to it not being included in the evidence for the trial of the group.

(While I'm at it, an appeal of the trial of A1's killer mentions W12 as an alias for 12World: [1]. This probably can't be used due to the link being PRIMARY unless the website for the Old Bailey is reputable, which it probably is.) Hwqaksd (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would have thought that the British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII) being hosted by the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, London and the Law Faculty, University College Cork would be considered reliable source, especially when the Queen's Bench of the Court of Appeal is directing that their judgement is being remotely handed down to the parties by its publication on this very website. Using this source is as if one went to the Court of Appeal and took judgement directly from the Presiding Officer's hands. While a Court decision might be a primary source, using it for simple facts stated in the judgement is acceptable. The problem comes if one attempts to analyse or interpret what such sources imply in making their decisions and attempting to generalize what the specific decision means to other situations. To perform such analysis, a secondary source is needed that analyses the judgement. However, the Judgement does say, at paragraph 18, in the section headed "The Facts", that "W12", or "12Anti", or "12 World" is a "Gang". I think that can still be cited from the Court judgement as it is fact established by the Court. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very well then; I'll add W12 as an alias for 12World. 12Anti appears to be a different thing and a The Guardian article notes, through a youth worker's quote, that the two rivaled each other at some point ([2]), so I'll discount it. Hwqaksd (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• 12World logo.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]