Talk:× Cambria
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled 2016 topic
The × before Cambria is a total nonsense since Cambria is NOT a hybrid genus name. PhilippeS13 (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Hectonichus and Plantdrew: Anyone happen to know anything about this? Anarchyte (talk | work) 04:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- After a quick glance on the internet, Cambria is certainly not a hybrid genus name and shouldn't have a ×. Could Cambria perhaps considered a species group in Vuylstekeara (and is that a good hybrid genus name)? It's getting late for me, but I'll try to check further in the morning.Plantdrew (talk) 05:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for looking, Plantdrew. I know very little about plants (I just like cleaning up their articles and writing short stubs about them to improve my limited knowledge) which is why I pinged you. Are you saying that it's possible this article (which should not have the hybrid ×) might be a member of the Vuylstekeara genus (which should have the hybrid ×)? Anarchyte (talk | work) 05:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- After a quick glance on the internet, Cambria is certainly not a hybrid genus name and shouldn't have a ×. Could Cambria perhaps considered a species group in Vuylstekeara (and is that a good hybrid genus name)? It's getting late for me, but I'll try to check further in the morning.Plantdrew (talk) 05:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- I think it should be redirected to × Aliceara and I have done this, moving a small amount of what appears to be relevant material, although it's still not sourced. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)