This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. South Asia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Southeast Asia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Writing systems Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

the image used for the malayalam jña ligature both here and on the ja (indic) page show the ligature for ñja instead Filipinojalapeno (talk) 20:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ña (Indic) → Ña – Per WP:OVERPRECISION. I'm wondering why they didn't move it yet. 143.179.74.165 (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support unless there are other uses that use this particular diacritic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't see any other uses for plain Ña than this. Even if there are, they probably don't deserve an article on Wikipedia. 143.179.74.165 (talk) 09:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose as per WP:Naming conventions (writing systems)#Glyphs and other elements. Wikiproject naming conventions are explicitly called out as exceptions at WP:OVERPRECISION, and this renaming would break the consistent naming of articles on the interrelated glyphs in Brahmic scripts. VanIsaac, GHTV ^contr_about 20:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]