Reciprocity law
In mathematics, a reciprocity law is a generalization of the law of quadratic reciprocity to arbitrary monic irreducible polynomials with integer coefficients. Recall that first reciprocity law, quadratic reciprocity, determines when an irreducible polynomial splits into linear terms when reduced mod . That is, it determines for which prime numbers the relation
holds. For a general reciprocity law[1]pg 3, it is defined as the rule determining which primes the polynomial splits into linear factors, denoted .
There are several different ways to express reciprocity laws. The early reciprocity laws found in the 19th century were usually expressed in terms of a power residue symbol (p/q) generalizing the quadratic reciprocity symbol, that describes when a prime number is an nth power residue modulo another prime, and gave a relation between (p/q) and (q/p). Hilbert reformulated the reciprocity laws as saying that a product over p of Hilbert norm residue symbols (a,b/p), taking values in roots of unity, is equal to 1. Artin reformulated the reciprocity laws as a statement that the Artin symbol from ideals (or ideles) to elements of a Galois group is trivial on a certain subgroup. Several more recent generalizations express reciprocity laws using cohomology of groups or representations of adelic groups or algebraic K-groups, and their relationship with the original quadratic reciprocity law can be hard to see.
The name reciprocity law was coined by Legendre in his 1785 publication Recherches d'analyse indéterminée,[2] because odd primes reciprocate or not in the sense of quadratic reciprocity stated below according to their residue classes . This reciprocating behavior does not generalize well, the equivalent splitting behavior does. The name reciprocity law is still used in the more general context of splittings.
Quadratic reciprocity
In terms of the Legendre symbol, the law of quadratic reciprocity states
for positive odd primes we have
Using the definition of the Legendre symbol this is equivalent to a more elementary statement about equations.
For positive odd primes the solubility of for determines the solubility of for and vice versa by the comparatively simple criterion whether is or .
By the factor theorem and the behavior of degrees in factorizations the solubility of such quadratic congruence equations is equivalent to the splitting of associated quadratic polynomials over a residue ring into linear factors. In this terminology the law of quadratic reciprocity is stated as follows.
For positive odd primes the splitting of the polynomial in -residues determines the splitting of the polynomial in -residues and vice versa through the quantity .
This establishes the bridge from the name giving reciprocating behavior of primes introduced by Legendre to the splitting behavior of polynomials used in the generalizations.
Cubic reciprocity
The law of cubic reciprocity for Eisenstein integers states that if α and β are primary (primes congruent to 2 mod 3) then
Quartic reciprocity
In terms of the quartic residue symbol, the law of quartic reciprocity for Gaussian integers states that if π and θ are primary (congruent to 1 mod (1+i)3) Gaussian primes then
Octic reciprocity
Eisenstein reciprocity
Suppose that ζ is an th root of unity for some odd prime . The power character is the power of ζ such that
for any prime ideal of Z[ζ]. It is extended to other ideals by multiplicativity. The Eisenstein reciprocity law states that
for a any rational integer coprime to and α any element of Z[ζ] that is coprime to a and and congruent to a rational integer modulo (1–ζ)2.
Kummer reciprocity
Suppose that ζ is an lth root of unity for some odd regular prime l. Since l is regular, we can extend the symbol {} to ideals in a unique way such that
- where n is some integer prime to l such that pn is principal.
The Kummer reciprocity law states that
for p and q any distinct prime ideals of Z[ζ] other than (1–ζ).
Hilbert reciprocity
In terms of the Hilbert symbol, Hilbert's reciprocity law for an algebraic number field states that
where the product is over all finite and infinite places. Over the rational numbers this is equivalent to the law of quadratic reciprocity. To see this take a and b to be distinct odd primes. Then Hilbert's law becomes But (p,q)p is equal to the Legendre symbol, (p,q)∞ is 1 if one of p and q is positive and –1 otherwise, and (p,q)2 is (–1)(p–1)(q–1)/4. So for p and q positive odd primes Hilbert's law is the law of quadratic reciprocity.
Artin reciprocity
In the language of ideles, the Artin reciprocity law for a finite extension L/K states that the Artin map from the idele class group CK to the abelianization Gal(L/K)ab of the Galois group vanishes on NL/K(CL), and induces an isomorphism
Although it is not immediately obvious, the Artin reciprocity law easily implies all the previously discovered reciprocity laws, by applying it to suitable extensions L/K. For example, in the special case when K contains the nth roots of unity and L=K[a1/n] is a Kummer extension of K, the fact that the Artin map vanishes on NL/K(CL) implies Hilbert's reciprocity law for the Hilbert symbol.
Local reciprocity
Hasse introduced a local analogue of the Artin reciprocity law, called the local reciprocity law. One form of it states that for a finite abelian extension of L/K of local fields, the Artin map is an isomorphism from onto the Galois group .
Explicit reciprocity laws
In order to get a classical style reciprocity law from the Hilbert reciprocity law Π(a,b)p=1, one needs to know the values of (a,b)p for p dividing n. Explicit formulas for this are sometimes called explicit reciprocity laws.
Power reciprocity laws
A power reciprocity law may be formulated as an analogue of the law of quadratic reciprocity in terms of the Hilbert symbols as[3]
Rational reciprocity laws
A rational reciprocity law is one stated in terms of rational integers without the use of roots of unity.
Scholz's reciprocity law
Shimura reciprocity
Weil reciprocity law
Langlands reciprocity
The Langlands program includes several conjectures for general reductive algebraic groups, which for the special of the group GL1 imply the Artin reciprocity law.
Yamamoto's reciprocity law
Yamamoto's reciprocity law is a reciprocity law related to class numbers of quadratic number fields.
See also
References
- ^ Hiramatsu, Toyokazu; Saito, Seiken (2016-05-04). An Introduction to Non-Abelian Class Field Theory. Series on Number Theory and Its Applications. WORLD SCIENTIFIC. doi:10.1142/10096. ISBN 978-981-314-226-8.
- ^ Chandrasekharan, K. (1985). Elliptic Functions. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 281. Berlin: Springer. p. 152f. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-52244-4. ISBN 3-540-15295-4.
- ^ Neukirch (1999) p.415
- Frei, Günther (1994), "The reciprocity law from Euler to Eisenstein", in Chikara, Sasaki (ed.), The intersection of history and mathematics. Papers presented at the history of mathematics symposium, held in Tokyo, Japan, August 31 - September 1, 1990, Sci. Networks Hist. Stud., vol. 15, Basel: Birkhäuser, pp. 67–90, doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1972-12997-5, ISBN 9780817650292, MR 0308080, Zbl 0818.01002
- Hilbert, David (1897), "Die Theorie der algebraischen Zahlkörper", Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung (in German), 4: 175–546, ISSN 0012-0456
- Hilbert, David (1998), The theory of algebraic number fields, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03545-0, ISBN 978-3-540-62779-1, MR 1646901
- Lemmermeyer, Franz (2000), Reciprocity laws. From Euler to Eisenstein, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12893-0, ISBN 3-540-66957-4, MR 1761696, Zbl 0949.11002
- Lemmermeyer, Franz, Reciprocity laws. From Kummer to Hilbert
- Neukirch, Jürgen (1999), Algebraic number theory, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 322, Translated from the German by Norbert Schappacher, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-65399-6, Zbl 0956.11021
- Stepanov, S. A. (2001) [1994], "Reciprocity laws", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
- Wyman, B. F. (1972), "What is a reciprocity law?", Amer. Math. Monthly, 79 (6): 571–586, doi:10.2307/2317083, JSTOR 2317083, MR 0308084. Correction, ibid. 80 (1973), 281.