Feu was long the most common form of land tenure in Scotland. Conveyancing in Scots law was dominated by forms which were called feudal until the Scottish Parliament passed the Abolition of Feudal Tenure etc. (Scotland) Act 2000.^{[Note 1]} The word is the Scots variant of fee.^{[Note 2]} The English had in 1660 abolished these tenures, with An Act Taking Away the Court of Wards ..., since 1948 known as the Tenures Abolition Act 1660.^[3]

Duplicands of Feu-duties (Scotland) Act 1920
Act of Parliament
Parliament of the United Kingdom
Long title	An Act to amend the law relating to the payment of duplicands of feu-duties in Scotland.
Citation	10 & 11 Geo. 5. c. 34
Dates
Royal assent	16 August 1920
Other legislation
Repealed by	Abolition of Feudal Tenure etc. (Scotland) Act 2000
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

Prior to 1832, only the vassals of the crown had votes in parliamentary elections for the Scots counties. This favoured subinfeudation as opposed to outright sale of land.^[4] This was changed by the Scottish Reform Act 1832, which increased the franchise of males in Scotland from 4,500 to 64,447.^{[Note 3]}

In Orkney and Shetland islands, land is still largely possessed as udal property, a holding derived or handed down from the time when these islands belonged to Norway.^{[Note 4]} Such lands could previously be converted into feus at the will of the proprietor and held from the Crown^[4] or the Marquess of Zetland.^{[citation needed]}

At one time, the system of conveyancing by which the transfer of feus was effected was curious and complicated by requiring the presence of parties on the land itself and the symbolic transfer of the property (for example, by throwing a shoe onto the earth of the property transferred)^{[Note 5]} together with the registration of various documents. However, legislation since the mid-19th century has changed all of that.^[4]

Various reforms were attempted before feu was eventually abolished by the Abolition of Feudal Tenure etc. (Scotland) Act 2000.

In feu holding, there is a substantial annual payment in money or in kind in return for the enjoyment of the land. The Crown is the first overlord or superior, and land is held of it by crown vassals. They, in turn, may feu their land to others, who become their vassals, and the former are mediate overlords or superiors. The process of sub-infeudation may be repeated to an indefinite extent. The Conveyancing (Scotland) Act 1874 rendered any clause in a disposition against subinfeudation null and void.^[4][7]

Casualties, which are a feature of land held in feu, are certain payments made to the superior thar are contingent on the happening of certain events. The most important was the payment of an amount equal to one year's feu-duty by a new holder, whether heir or purchaser of the feu. The Conveyancing (Scotland) Act abolished casualties in all feus after that date, and power was given to redeem that burden on feus already existing. If the vassal does not pay the feu-duty for two years, the superior, among other remedies, may obtain by legal process a decree of irritancy, whereupon tinsel or forfeiture of the feu follows.^[4]

There have been other forms of tenure:

1. Booking is a conveyance peculiar to the burgh of Paisley but does not differ essentially from feu.^{[Note 6]}
2. Burgage is the system by which land is held in Royal Burghs.^{[Note 7]}
3. Blench holding is by a nominal payment, as of a penny Scots, or a red rose, often only to be rendered upon demand.^{[Note 8]}
4. Mortification, an ecclesiastical or other charitable holding in which tenure is granted ad manum mortuum, that is, inalienably and in forfeiture of all the normal superiors' casualties
5. Ward, the original military holding, was abolished in 1747 (20 Geo. 2. c. 20), as an effect of the rising of 1745.^{[Note 9]}

• Fee simple
• Fee tail
• Feoffee
• Trespass for mesne profits

•  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Feu". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 10 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 296.