Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

GCHQ

Not to be confused with HM Government Communications Centre or Conservative Campaign Headquarters.

Government Communications Headquarters

The Doughnut from above in 2017
Agency overview
Formed1 November 1919; 105 years ago (1919-11-01) (as Government Code and Cypher School)
Preceding agencies
JurisdictionHis Majesty's Government
HeadquartersThe Doughnut
Hubble Road
Cheltenham, England
United Kingdom
51°53′58″N 2°07′28″W / 51.89944°N 2.12444°W / 51.89944; -2.12444
Employees7,181[1]
Annual budgetSingle Intelligence Account (£3.711 billion in 2021–2022)[1]
Minister responsible
Agency executive
Child agencies
Websitewww.gchq.gov.uk Edit this at Wikidata
Footnotes

Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) is an intelligence and security organisation responsible for providing signals intelligence (SIGINT) and information assurance (IA) to the government and armed forces of the United Kingdom.[2] Primarily based at "The Doughnut" in the suburbs of Cheltenham, GCHQ is the responsibility of the country's Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Foreign Secretary), but it is not a part of the Foreign Office and its director ranks as a Permanent Secretary.

GCHQ was originally established after the First World War as the Government Code and Cypher School (GC&CS)[3] and was known under that name until 1946. During the Second World War it was located at Bletchley Park, where it was responsible for breaking the German Enigma codes. There are two main components of GCHQ, the Composite Signals Organisation (CSO), which is responsible for gathering information, and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), which is responsible for securing the UK's own communications. The Joint Technical Language Service (JTLS) is a small department and cross-government resource responsible for mainly technical language support and translation and interpreting services across government departments. It is co-located with GCHQ for administrative purposes.

In 2013, GCHQ received considerable media attention when the former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden revealed that the agency was in the process of collecting all online and telephone data in the UK via the Tempora programme.[4] Snowden's revelations began a spate of ongoing disclosures of global surveillance. The Guardian newspaper was forced to destroy computer hard drives with the files Snowden had given them because of the threats of a lawsuit under the Official Secrets Act.[5] In June 2014, The Register reported that the information the government sought to suppress by destroying the hard drives related to the location of a "beyond top secret" GCHQ internet monitoring base in Seeb, Oman, and the close involvement of BT and Cable & Wireless in intercepting internet communications.[6]

Structure

GCHQ is led by the Director of GCHQ, Anne Keast-Butler, and a Corporate Board, made up of executive and non-executive directors. Reporting to the Corporate Board are:[7][8]

  • Sigint missions: comprising maths and cryptanalysis, IT and computer systems, linguistics and translation, and the intelligence analysis unit
  • Enterprise: comprising applied research and emerging technologies, corporate knowledge and information systems, commercial supplier relationships, and biometrics
  • Corporate management: enterprise resource planning, human resources, internal audit, and architecture
  • National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC).[9]

History

See also: Second World War activities of GC&CS referred to as 'Ultra'

World War I

During the First World War, the British Army and Royal Navy had separate signals intelligence agencies, MI1b and NID25 (initially known as Room 40) respectively.[10][11] In 1919, the Cabinet's Secret Service Committee, chaired by Lord Curzon, recommended that a peacetime codebreaking agency should be created, a task which was given to the Director of Naval Intelligence, Hugh Sinclair.[12] Sinclair merged staff from NID25 and MI1b into the new organisation, which initially consisted of around 25–30 officers and a similar number of clerical staff.[13] It was titled the "Government Code and Cypher School" (GC&CS), a cover-name which was chosen by Victor Forbes of the Foreign Office.[14] Alastair Denniston, who had been a member of NID25, was appointed as its operational head.[12] It was initially under the control of the Admiralty and located in Watergate House, Adelphi, London.[12] Its public function was "to advise as to the security of codes and cyphers used by all Government departments and to assist in their provision", but also had a secret directive to "study the methods of cypher communications used by foreign powers".[15] GC&CS officially formed on 1 November 1919,[16] and produced its first decrypt prior to that date, on 19 October.[12]

Allidina Visram school in Mombasa, pictured above in 2006, was the location of the British "Kilindini" codebreaking outpost during World War II.

Before the Second World War, GC&CS was a relatively small department. By 1922, the main focus of GC&CS was on diplomatic traffic, with "no service traffic ever worth circulating"[17] and so, at the initiative of Lord Curzon, it was transferred from the Admiralty to the Foreign Office.[18] GC&CS came under the supervision of Hugh Sinclair, who by 1923 was both the Chief of SIS and Director of GC&CS.[12] In 1925, both organisations were co-located on different floors of Broadway Buildings, opposite St. James's Park.[12] Messages decrypted by GC&CS were distributed in blue-jacketed files that became known as "BJs".[19] In the 1920s, GC&CS was successfully reading Soviet Union diplomatic cyphers. However, in May 1927, during a row over clandestine Soviet support for the General Strike and the distribution of subversive propaganda, Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin made details from the decrypts public.[20]

World War II

During the Second World War, GC&CS was based largely at Bletchley Park, in present-day Milton Keynes, working on understanding the German Enigma machine and Lorenz ciphers.[21] In 1940, GC&CS was working on the diplomatic codes and ciphers of 26 countries, tackling over 150 diplomatic cryptosystems.[22] Senior staff included Alastair Denniston, Oliver Strachey, Dilly Knox, John Tiltman, Edward Travis, Ernst Fetterlein, Josh Cooper, Donald Michie, Alan Turing, Gordon Welchman, Joan Clarke, Max Newman, William Tutte, I. J. (Jack) Good, Peter Calvocoressi and Hugh Foss.[23] The 1943 British–US Communication Intelligence Agreement, BRUSA, connected the signal intercept networks of the GC&CS and the US National Security Agency (NSA).[24][25] Equipment used to break enemy codes included the Colossus computer.[26] Colossus consisted of ten networked computers.[27]

An outstation in the Far East, the Far East Combined Bureau, was set up in Hong Kong in 1935 and moved to Singapore in 1939. Subsequently, with the Japanese advance down the Malay Peninsula, the Army and RAF codebreakers went to the Wireless Experimental Centre in Delhi, India. The Navy codebreakers in FECB went to Colombo, Ceylon, then to Kilindini, near Mombasa, Kenya.[28]

Post Second World War

GC&CS was renamed the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in June 1946.[29]

The organisation was at first based in Eastcote in northwest London, then in 1951[30] moved to the outskirts of Cheltenham, setting up two sites at Oakley and Benhall. One of the major reasons for selecting Cheltenham was that the town had been the location of the headquarters of the United States Army Services of Supply for the European Theater during the War, which built up a telecommunications infrastructure in the region to carry out its logistics tasks.[31]

Following the Second World War, US and British intelligence have shared information as part of the UKUSA Agreement. The principal aspect of this is that GCHQ and its US equivalent, the National Security Agency (NSA), share technologies, infrastructure and information.[32][9]

GCHQ ran many signals intelligence (SIGINT) monitoring stations abroad. During the early Cold War, the remnants of the British Empire provided a global network of ground stations which were a major contribution to the UKUSA Agreement; the US regarded RAF Little Sai Wan in Hong Kong as the most valuable of these. The monitoring stations were largely run by inexpensive National Service recruits, but when this ended in the early 1960s, the increased cost of civilian employees caused budgetary problems. In 1965 a Foreign Office review found that 11,500 staff were involved in SIGINT collection (8,000 GCHQ staff and 3,500 military personnel), exceeding the size of the Diplomatic Service. Reaction to the Suez War led to the eviction of GCHQ from several of its best foreign SIGINT collection sites, including the new Perkar, Ceylon site and RAF Habbaniya, Iraq. The staff largely moved to tented encampments on military bases in Cyprus, which later became the Sovereign Base Area.[33]

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, GCHQ Scarborough intercepted radio communications from Soviet ships reporting their positions and used that to establish where they were heading. A copy of the report was sent directly to the White House Situation Room, providing initial indications of Soviet intentions with regards the US naval blockade of Cuba.[34]

Duncan Campbell and Mark Hosenball revealed the existence of GCHQ in 1976 in an article for Time Out; as a result, Hosenball was deported from the UK.[35][36] GCHQ had a very low profile in the media until 1983 when the trial of Geoffrey Prime, a KGB mole within it, created considerable media interest.[37]

Trade union disputes

Main articles: Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service and GCHQ trade union ban
NUCPS banner on march in Cheltenham 1992

In 1984, GCHQ was the centre of a political row when, in the wake of strikes which affected Sigint collection, the Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher prohibited its employees from belonging to a trade union, asserting that membership of a union was in conflict with national security.[9] The government offered £1,000 to each employee who agreed to give up their right to union membership. Following the breakdown of talks and the failure to negotiate a no-strike agreement, a number of mass national one-day strikes were held to protest against this decision, believed by some to be the first step to wider bans on trade unions. Appeals to British courts and the European Commission of Human Rights[38] were unsuccessful. An appeal to the International Labour Organization resulted in a decision that the government's actions were in violation of Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention.[39]

A no-strike agreement was eventually negotiated and the ban lifted by the incoming Labour government in 1997, with the Government Communications Group of the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) being formed to represent interested employees at all grades.[40][9] In 2000, a group of 14 former GCHQ employees, who had been dismissed after refusing to give up their union membership, were offered re-employment, which three of them accepted.[41]

The legal case Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service is significant beyond the dispute, and even beyond trade union law, in that it held for the first time that the royal prerogative is generally subject to judicial review, although the House of Lords ruled in favour of the Crown in this instance.[42]

Post Cold War

1990s: Post-Cold War restructuring

The Intelligence Services Act 1994 formalised the activities of the intelligence agencies for the first time, defining their purpose, and the British Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee was given a remit to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the three intelligence agencies.[43] The objectives of GCHQ were defined as working as "in the interests of national security, with particular reference to the defence and foreign policies of His Majesty's government; in the interests of the economic wellbeing of the United Kingdom; and in support of the prevention and the detection of serious crime".[44] During the introduction of the Intelligence Agency Act in late 1993, the former Prime Minister Jim Callaghan had described GCHQ as a "full-blown bureaucracy", adding that future bodies created to provide oversight of the intelligence agencies should "investigate whether all the functions that GCHQ carries out today are still necessary."[45]

In late 1993 civil servant Michael Quinlan advised a deep review of the work of GCHQ following the conclusion of his "Review of Intelligence Requirements and Resources", which had imposed a 3% cut on the agency.[46] The Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Jonathan Aitken, subsequently held face to face discussions with the intelligence agency directors to assess further savings in the wake of Quinlan's review. Aldrich (2010) suggests that Sir John Adye, the then Director of GCHQ performed badly in meetings with Aitken, leading Aitken to conclude that GCHQ was "suffering from out-of-date methods of management and out-of-date methods for assessing priorities".[47] GCHQ's budget was £850 million in 1993, (£2.19 billion as of 2023)[48] compared to £125 million for the Security Service and SIS (MI5 and MI6). In December 1994 the businessman Roger Hurn was commissioned to begin a review of GCHQ, which was concluded in March 1995.[49] Hurn's report recommended a cut of £100  million in GCHQ's budget; such a large reduction had not been suffered by any British intelligence agency since the end of World War II.[49] The J Division of GCHQ, which had collected SIGINT on Russia, disappeared as a result of the cuts.[49] The cuts had been mostly reversed by 2000 in the wake of threats from violent non-state actors, and risks from increased terrorism, organised crime and illegal access to nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.[50]

David Omand became the Director of GCHQ in 1996, and greatly restructured the agency in the face of new and changing targets and rapid technological change.[51] Omand introduced the concept of "Sinews" (or "SIGINT New Systems") which allowed more flexible working methods, avoiding overlaps in work by creating fourteen domains, each with a well-defined working scope.[51] The tenure of Omand also saw the construction of a modern new headquarters, intended to consolidate the two old sites at Oakley and Benhall into a single, more open-plan work environment.[51] Located on a 176-acre site in Benhall, it would be the largest building constructed for secret intelligence operations outside the United States.[52][9]

Operations at GCHQ's Chung Hom Kok listening station in Hong Kong ended in 1994.[53] GCHQ's Hong Kong operations were extremely important to their relationship with the NSA, who contributed investment and equipment to the station. In anticipation of the transfer of Hong Kong to the Chinese government in 1997, the Hong Kong stations operations were moved to Australian Defence Satellite Communications Station in Geraldton in Western Australia.[54]

Operations that used GCHQ's intelligence-gathering capabilities in the 1990s included the monitoring of communications of Iraqi soldiers in the Gulf War, of dissident republican terrorists and the Real IRA, of the various factions involved in the Yugoslav Wars, and of the criminal Kenneth Noye.[50][54][55] In the mid-1990s GCHQ began to assist in the investigation of cybercrime.[56]

2000s: Coping with the Internet

See also: Global surveillance and Global surveillance disclosures (2013–present)

At the end of 2003, GCHQ moved in to its new building. Built on a circular plan around a large central courtyard, it quickly became known as the Doughnut. At the time, it was one of the largest public-sector building projects in Europe, with an estimated cost of £337 million. The new building, which was designed by Gensler and constructed by Carillion, became the base for all of GCHQ's Cheltenham operations.[57]

The public spotlight fell on GCHQ in late 2003 and early 2004 following the sacking of Katharine Gun after she leaked to The Observer a confidential email from agents at the United States' National Security Agency addressed to GCHQ officers about the wiretapping of UN delegates in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war.[58]

GCHQ gains its intelligence by monitoring a wide variety of communications and other electronic signals. For this, a number of stations have been established in the UK and overseas. The listening stations are at Cheltenham itself, Bude, Scarborough, Ascension Island, and with the United States at RAF Menwith Hill.[59] Ayios Nikolaos Station in Cyprus is run by the British Army for GCHQ.[60]

In March 2010, GCHQ was criticised by the Intelligence and Security Committee for problems with its IT security practices and failing to meet its targets for work targeted against cyber attacks.[61]

As revealed by Edward Snowden in The Guardian, GCHQ spied on foreign politicians visiting the 2009 G-20 London Summit by eavesdropping phonecalls and emails and monitoring their computers, and in some cases even ongoing after the summit via keystroke logging that had been undertaken during the summit.[62]

According to Edward Snowden, at that time GCHQ had two principal umbrella programs for collecting communications:

GCHQ has also had access to the US internet monitoring programme PRISM from at least as far back as June 2010.[64] PRISM is said to give the National Security Agency and FBI easy access to the systems of nine of the world's top internet companies, including Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple, Yahoo, and Skype.[65]

From 2013, GCHQ realised that public attitudes to Sigint had changed and its former unquestioned secrecy was no longer appropriate or acceptable. The growing use of the Internet, together with its inherent insecurities, meant that the communications traffic of private citizens were becoming inextricably mixed with those of their targets and openness in the handling of this issue was becoming essential to their credibility as an organisation. The Internet had become a "cyber commons", with its dominance creating a "second age of Sigint". GCHQ transformed itself accordingly, including greatly expanded Public Relations and Legal departments, and adopting public education in cyber security as an important part of its remit.[66]

2010s: Disinformation, discord and division

In February 2014, The Guardian, based on documents provided by Snowden, revealed that GCHQ had indiscriminately collected 1.8 million private Yahoo webcam images from users across the world.[67] In the same month NBC and The Intercept, based on documents released by Snowden, revealed the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group and the Computer Network Exploitation units within GCHQ. Their mission was cyber operations based on "dirty tricks" to shut down enemy communications, discredit, and plant misinformation on enemies.[68] These operations were 5% of all GCHQ operations according to a conference slideshow presented by the GCHQ.[69]

Soon after becoming Director of GCHQ in 2014, Robert Hannigan wrote an article in the Financial Times on the topic of internet surveillance, stating that "however much [large US technology companies] may dislike it, they have become the command and control networks of choice for terrorists and criminals" and that GCHQ and its sister agencies "cannot tackle these challenges at scale without greater support from the private sector", arguing that most internet users "would be comfortable with a better and more sustainable relationship between the [intelligence] agencies and the tech companies". Since the 2013 global surveillance disclosures, large US technology companies have improved security and become less co-operative with foreign intelligence agencies, including those of the UK, generally requiring a US court order before disclosing data.[70][71] However the head of the UK technology industry group techUK rejected these claims, stating that they understood the issues but that disclosure obligations "must be based upon a clear and transparent legal framework and effective oversight rather than, as suggested, a deal between the industry and government".[72]

In 2015, documents obtained by The Intercept from US National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that GCHQ had carried out a mass-surveillance operation, codenamed KARMA POLICE, since about 2008.[73] The operation swept up the IP address of Internet users visiting websites, and was established with no public scrutiny or oversight. KARMA POLICE is a powerful spying tool in conjunction with other GCHQ programs because IP addresses could be cross-referenced with other data.[73] The goal of the program, according to the documents, was "either (a) a web browsing profile for every visible user on the internet, or (b) a user profile for every visible website on the internet."[73]

In 2015, GCHQ admitted for the first time in court that it conducts computer hacking.[74]

In 2017, US Press Secretary Sean Spicer made allegations that GCHQ had conducted surveillance on US President Donald Trump. These unfounded claims were based on statements made during an opinion piece in a FOX media segment.[75][76] The US government formally apologised for the unfounded allegations and promised they would not be repeated.[77][78][79]

British intelligence did gather information relating to Russian contacts made by Trump's campaign team in the run-up to his election, which were passed on to US intelligence agencies.[80][81]

On 31 October 2018, GCHQ joined Instagram.[82][83]

Personnel awards

GCHQ personnel are recognised annually by King Charles III (formerly the Prince of Wales) at the Prince of Wales's Intelligence Community Awards at St James's Palace or Clarence House alongside members of the Security Service (MI5), and Secret Intelligence Service (MI6).[84] Awards and citations are given to teams within the agencies as well as individuals.[84]

Security mission

As well as a mission to gather intelligence, GCHQ has for a long time had a corresponding mission to assist in the protection of the British government's own communications. When the Government Code and Cypher School (GC&CS) was created in 1919, its overt task was providing security advice.[85] GC&CS's Security section was located in Mansfield College, Oxford during the Second World War.[85]

In April 1946, GC&CS became GCHQ, and the now GCHQ Security section moved from Oxford to join the rest of the organisation at Eastcote later that year.[85]

LCSA

From 1952 to 1954, the intelligence mission of GCHQ relocated to Cheltenham; the Security section remained at Eastcote,[85] and in March 1954 became a separate, independent organisation: the London Communications Security Agency (LCSA),[85] which in 1958 was renamed to the London Communications-Electronic Security Agency (LCESA).[85]

In April 1965, GPO and MOD units merged with LCESA to become the Communications-Electronic Security Department (CESD).[85]

CESG

In October 1969, CESD was merged into GCHQ and becoming Communications-Electronic Security Group (CESG).[85]

In 1977 CESG relocated from Eastcote to Cheltenham.[85]

CESG continued as the UK National Technical Authority for information assurance, including cryptography. CESG did not manufacture security equipment, but worked with industry to ensure the availability of suitable products and services, while GCHQ itself funded research into such areas, for example to the Centre for Quantum Computation at Oxford University and the Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research at the University of Bristol.[86]

In the 21st century, CESG ran a number of assurance schemes such as CHECK, CLAS, Commercial Product Assurance (CPA) and CESG Assisted Products Service (CAPS).[87]

Public key encryption

In 1970 the concept for public-key encryption (public key infrastructure) was developed and proven by GCHQ's James H. Ellis. Ellis lacked the number theory skills required to build a workable system. In 1974 GCHQ mathematician Clifford Cocks had developed a workable public key cryptography algorithm and a workable PKI system. Cocks's system was not available in the public domain until it was declassified in 1997.[88][89]

By 1997 broader public key cryptography commercial technologies had been independently developed and had become well established, in areas such as email security, digital signatures, and TLS (a fundamental TCP/IP security component) etc.[90] Most notably in 1977 the RSA algorithm had been developed (equivalent to Cocks's system) and by 1997 was extremely well established.[91]

NCSC

In 2016, the National Cyber Security Centre was established under GCHQ but located in London, as the UK's authority on cybersecurity. It absorbed and replaced CESG as well as activities that had previously existed outside GCHQ: the Centre for Cyber Assessment (CCA), Computer Emergency Response Team UK (CERT UK) and the cyber-related responsibilities of the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI).[92]

Joint Technical Language Service

The Joint Technical Language Service (JTLS) was established in 1955,[93] drawing on members of the small Ministry of Defence technical language team and others, initially to provide standard English translations for organisational expressions in any foreign language, discover the correct English equivalents of technical terms in foreign languages and discover the correct expansions of abbreviations in any language.[94] The remit of the JTLS has expanded in the ensuing years to cover technical language support and interpreting and translation services across the UK Government and to local public sector services in Gloucestershire and surrounding counties. The JTLS also produces and publishes foreign language working aids under crown copyright and conducts research into machine translation and on-line dictionaries and glossaries. The JTLS is co-located with GCHQ for administrative purposes.[95]

International relationships

See also: UKUSA Agreement and Five Eyes

GCHQ operates in partnership with equivalent agencies worldwide in a number of bi-lateral and multi-lateral relationships. The principal of these is with the United States (National Security Agency), Canada (Communications Security Establishment), Australia (Australian Signals Directorate) and New Zealand (Government Communications Security Bureau), through the mechanism of the UK-US Security Agreement, a broad intelligence-sharing agreement encompassing a range of intelligence collection methods. Relationships are alleged to include shared collection methods, such as the system described in the popular media as ECHELON, as well as analysed product.[96]

Main article: Intelligence Services Act 1994

GCHQ's legal basis is established by the Intelligence Services Act 1994 Section 3 as follows:

  • (1) There shall continue to be a Government Communications Headquarters under the authority of the Secretary of State; and, subject to subsection (2) below, its functions shall be—
    • (a) to monitor or interfere with electromagnetic, acoustic and other emissions and any equipment producing such emissions and to obtain and provide information derived from or related to such emissions or equipment and from encrypted material; and
    • (b) to provide advice and assistance about—
      • (i) languages, including terminology used for technical matters, and
      • (ii) cryptography and other matters relating to the protection of information and other material, to the armed forces of the Crown, to Her Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom or to a Northern Ireland Department or to any other organisation which is determined for the purposes of this section in such manner as may be specified by the Prime Minister.
  • (2) The functions referred to in subsection (1)(a) above shall be exercisable only—
    • (a) in the interests of national security, with particular reference to the defence and foreign policies of His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom; or
    • (b) in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom in relation to the actions or intentions of persons outside the British Islands; or
    • (c) in support of the prevention or detection of serious crime.
  • (3) In this Act, the expression "GCHQ" refers to the Government Communications Headquarters and to any unit or part of a unit of the armed forces of the Crown which is for the time being required by the Secretary of State to assist the Government Communications Headquarters in carrying out its functions.[44]

Activities that involve interception of communications are permitted under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000; this kind of interception can only be carried out after a warrant has been issued by a Secretary of State. The Human Rights Act 1998 requires the intelligence agencies, including GCHQ, to respect citizens' rights as described in the European Convention on Human Rights.[97][98][99]

Oversight

See also: Mass surveillance in the United Kingdom

The Prime Minister nominates cross-party Members of Parliament to an Intelligence and Security Committee. The remit of the Committee includes oversight of intelligence and security activities and reports are made directly to Parliament.[43] Its functions were increased under the Justice and Security Act 2013 to provide for further access and investigatory powers.[100]

Judicial oversight of GCHQ's conduct is exercised by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.[101] The UK also has an independent Intelligence Services Commissioner and Interception of Communications Commissioner, both of whom are former senior judges.[102]

The Investigatory Powers Tribunal ruled in December 2014 that GCHQ does not breach the European Convention of Human Rights, and that its activities are compliant with Articles 8 (right to privacy) and 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention of Human Rights.[98] However, the Tribunal stated in February 2015 that one particular aspect, the data-sharing arrangement that allowed UK Intelligence services to request data from the US surveillance programmes Prism and Upstream, had been in contravention of human rights law prior to this until two paragraphs of additional information, providing details about the procedures and safeguards, were disclosed to the public in December 2014.[103][104][105]

Furthermore, the IPT ruled that the legislative framework in the United Kingdom does not permit mass surveillance and that while GCHQ collects and analyses data in bulk, it does not practice mass surveillance.[98][106][107] This complements independent reports by the Interception of Communications Commissioner,[108] and a special report made by the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament; although several shortcomings and potential improvements to both oversight and the legislative framework were highlighted.[109]

Abuses

Despite the inherent secrecy around much of GCHQ's work, investigations carried out by the UK government after the Snowden disclosures have admitted various abuses by the security services. A report by the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) in 2015 revealed that a small number of staff at UK intelligence agencies had been found to misuse their surveillance powers, in one case leading to the dismissal of a member of staff at GCHQ, although there were no laws in place at the time to make these abuses a criminal offence.[110]

Later that year, a ruling by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found that GCHQ acted unlawfully in conducting surveillance on two human rights organisations. The closed hearing found the government in breach of its internal surveillance policies in accessing and retaining the communications of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights and the Legal Resources Centre in South Africa. This was only the second time in the IPT's history that it had made a positive determination in favour of applicants after a closed session.[111]

At another IPT case in 2015, GCHQ conceded that "from January 2010, the regime for the interception/obtaining, analysis, use, disclosure and destruction of legally privileged material has not been in accordance with the law for the purposes of Article 8(2) of the European convention on human rights and was accordingly unlawful".[112] This admission was made in connection with a case brought against them by Abdelhakim Belhaj, a Libyan opponent of the former Gaddafi regime, and his wife Fatima Bouchard. The couple accused British ministers and officials of participating in their unlawful abduction, kidnapping and removal to Libya in March 2004, while Gaddafi was still in power.[113]

On 25 May 2021, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled that the GCHQ is guilty of violating data privacy rules through their bulk interception of communications, and does not provide sufficient protections for confidential journalistic material because it gathers communications in bulk.[114]

Surveillance of parliamentarians

In 2015 there was a complaint by Green Party MP Caroline Lucas that British intelligence services, including GCHQ, had been spying on MPs allegedly "in defiance of laws prohibiting it."[115]

Then-Home Secretary, Theresa May, had told Parliament in 2014 that:

Obviously, the Wilson Doctrine applies to parliamentarians. It does not absolutely exclude the use of these powers against parliamentarians, but it sets certain requirements for those powers to be used in relation to a parliamentarian. It is not the case that parliamentarians are excluded and nobody else in the country is, but there is a certain set of rules and protocols that have to be met if there is a requirement to use any of these powers against a parliamentarian.[116]

The Investigatory Powers Tribunal investigated the complaint, and ruled that contrary to the allegation, there was no law that gave the communications of Parliament any special protection.[117] The Wilson Doctrine merely acts as a political convention.[118]

A controversial GCHQ case determined the scope of judicial review of prerogative powers (the Crown's residual powers under common law). This was Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 (often known simply as the "GCHQ case"). In this case, a prerogative Order in Council had been used by the prime minister (who is the Minister for the Civil Service) to ban trade union activities by civil servants working at GCHQ. This order was issued without consultation. The House of Lords had to decide whether this was reviewable by judicial review. It was held that executive action is not immune from judicial review simply because it uses powers derived from common law rather than statute (thus the prerogative is reviewable).[119]

Leadership

Main article: Director of the Government Communications Headquarters

The following is a list of the heads and operational heads of GCHQ and GC&CS:

Stations and former stations

The following are stations and former stations that have operated since the Cold War.[120][121]

In the historical drama film The Imitation Game (2014) Benedict Cumberbatch portrays Alan Turing in his efforts to break the Enigma code while employed by the Government Code and Cypher School.[122]

GCHQ have set a number of cryptic online challenges to the public, used to attract interest and for recruitment, starting in late 1999.[123][124] The response to the 2004 challenge was described as "excellent",[125] and the challenge set in 2015 had over 600,000 attempts.[126] It also published the GCHQ Puzzle Book in 2016 which sold more than 300,000 copies, with the proceeds going to charity. A second book was published in October 2018.[127]

GCHQ appeared in the Doctor Who 2019 special "Resolution" where the Reconnaissance Scout Dalek storms the facility and exterminates the staff in order to use the organisation's resources to summon a Dalek fleet.[128][129]

GCHQ is the setting of the 2020 Sky One sitcom Intelligence, featuring David Schwimmer as an incompetent American NSA officer liaising with GCHQ's Cyber Crimes unit.[130]

In October 2020, intelligence and security expert John Ferris published Behind the Enigma: The Authorised History of GCHQ, Britain's Secret Cyber-Intelligence Agency.[131]

GCHQ is the setting of the 2022 Channel 4 drama The Undeclared War. Set in the near future, it depicts a work experience student at the government agency during a cyberattack on the UK and the implications.[132]

See also

GCHQ units:

GCHQ specifics:

  • Capenhurst – said to be home to a GCHQ monitoring site in the 1990s
  • Hugh Alexander – head of the cryptanalysis division at GCHQ from 1949 to 1971
  • Operation Socialist, a 2010–2013 operation in Belgium
  • Zircon, the cancelled 1980s GCHQ satellite project

UK agencies:

Elsewhere:

Notes and references

  1. ^ a b "Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament "Annual Report 2021–2022"" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 December 2022. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  2. ^ GCHQ – Welcome to GCHQ Archived 22 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Government of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 7 July 2014.
  3. ^ Headrick, Daniel R. (1991) The invisible Weapon: Telecommunications and International Politics 1851-1945, Oxford UP p219
  4. ^ "A simple guide to GCHQ's internet surveillance programme Tempora". Wired UK. 24 June 2013. Archived from the original on 15 May 2016. Retrieved 29 August 2017.
  5. ^ Borger, Julian (21 August 2013). "NSA files: why the Guardian in London destroyed hard drives of leaked files". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 February 2017. Retrieved 27 May 2018.
  6. ^ Campbell, Duncan (3 June 2014). "Revealed: GCHQ's beyond top secret middle eastern internet spy base". The Register. Archived from the original on 25 June 2014. Retrieved 16 September 2017.
  7. ^ Aldrich, 2010, p. 565
  8. ^ (secondary) Leong, Angela (2007). The Disruption of International Organised Crime: An Analysis of Legal and Non-Legal Strategies. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-7066-7. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  9. ^ a b c d e Ferris (2020)
  10. ^ Gannon, Paul (2011). Inside Room 40: The Codebreakers of World War I. Ian Allan Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7110-3408-2.
  11. ^ Johnson, 1997, p. 27
  12. ^ a b c d e f Johnson, 1997, p. 44
  13. ^ Johnson, 1997, p. 45 and Kahn, 1991, p. 82; these sources give different numbers for the initial size of the GC&CS staff
  14. ^ Macksey, Kenneth (2003). The Searchers: How Radio Interception Changed the Course of Both World Wars. Cassell Military. p. 58. ISBN 0-304-36545-9.
  15. ^ Smith, 2001, pp. 16–17
  16. ^ Kahn, 1991, p. 82
  17. ^ Denniston, Alastair G. (1986). "The Government Code and Cypher School Between the Wars". Intelligence and National Security. 1 (1): 48–70. doi:10.1080/02684528608431841.
  18. ^ Smith, 2001, pp. 20–21
  19. ^ Smith, 2001, pp. 18–19
  20. ^ Aldrich, 2010, p. 18
  21. ^ Gannon, Paul (2006). Colossus: Bletchley Park's Greatest Secret. Atlantic Books. ISBN 978-1-84354-331-2.
  22. ^ Alvarez, David (2001). "Most Helpful and Cooperative: GC&CS and the Development of American Diplomatic Cryptanalysis, 1941–1942". In Smith, Michael; Erskine, Ralph (eds.). Action This Day: Bletchley Park from the Breaking of the Enigma Code to the Birth of the Modern Computer. Bantam Press. ISBN 978-0593049105.
  23. ^ Erskine, Ralph; Smith, Michael, eds. (2011), The Bletchley Park Codebreakers, Biteback Publishing Ltd, ISBN 978-1-84954-078-0
  24. ^ "How the British and Americans started listening in". BBC News. 8 February 2016. Archived from the original on 2 April 2023. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
  25. ^ "Diary reveals birth of secret UK-US spy pact that grew into Five Eyes". BBC News. 5 March 2021. Archived from the original on 2 April 2023. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
  26. ^ Preneel, Bart, ed. (2000), "Colossus and the German Lorenz Cipher – Code Breaking in WW II" (PDF), Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2000: International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques Bruges, Belgium May 14-18, 2000, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1807, Springer, p. 417, doi:10.1007/3-540-45539-6_29, ISBN 978-3540675174, archived (PDF) from the original on 20 November 2008
  27. ^ McCallum, Shiona (17 January 2024). "Unseen images of code breaking computer that helped win WW2". BBC. Retrieved 21 January 2024.
  28. ^ "Mombasa was base for high-level UK espionage operation". Coastweek. Archived from the original on 15 May 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
  29. ^ Smith, Michael (1998). Station X. Channel 4 books. p. 176. ISBN 0-330-41929-3.
  30. ^ "History of GCHQ Cheltenham". GCHQ website 'About Us' pages. Archived from the original on 5 October 2006. Retrieved 29 June 2006.
  31. ^ Dormon, Bob (24 May 2013). "INSIDE GCHQ: Welcome to Cheltenham's cottage industry". The Register. Archived from the original on 6 September 2021. Retrieved 6 September 2016.
  32. ^ Murray, Craig (16 October 2007). Dirty Diplomacy. Scribner. p. 332. ISBN 978-1416548010.
  33. ^ Aldrich, Richard J. (2011). GCHQ. London: Harper Press. pp. 117–118, 153, 155, 160–162, 227–228, 475. ISBN 978-0-007312-665. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 21 March 2023.
  34. ^ Corera, Gordon (21 October 2019). "Scarborough's Cuban missile crisis role revealed". Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2019.
  35. ^ Duncan Campbell; Mark Hosenball (21 May 1976). "The Eavesdroppers" (PDF). Time Out. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 November 2013. Retrieved 1 March 2016.
  36. ^ Court ruling, "R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hosenball Archived 21 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine", [1977] 1 W.L.R. 766; [1977] 3 All E.R. 452. Lord Denning presiding judge, 29 March 1977.
  37. ^ Aldrich, 2010, p. 382
  38. ^ "EComHR Inadmissibility decision of EComHR on application no. 11603/85". 1987. Archived from the original on 4 June 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2010.
  39. ^ "EComHR Inadmissibility decision of EComHR on application no. 11603/85 – The Facts". Archived from the original on 4 June 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2010. para. IV
  40. ^ "Union representation". GCHQ website. Archived from the original on 9 May 2006. Retrieved 12 April 2006.
  41. ^ "Sacked GCHQ workers win compensation". BBC News. 1 February 2000. Archived from the original on 1 September 2017. Retrieved 12 April 2006.
  42. ^ McGaughey, Ewan (2019). "8: Trade Unions". A Casebook on Labour Law. Hart. p. 360. ISBN 978-1-84946-931-9.
  43. ^ a b "ISC – About". Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament. Archived from the original on 25 December 2010. Retrieved 1 December 2013.
  44. ^ a b "Intelligence Services Act 1994". The National Archives. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 1 December 2013.
  45. ^ "Hansard: December 1993 Intelligence Services Bill". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). 9 December 1993. Archived from the original on 19 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
  46. ^ Aldrich 2010, p. 493
  47. ^ Aldrich 2010, p. 494
  48. ^ UK Retail Price Index inflation figures are based on data from Clark, Gregory (2017). "The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
  49. ^ a b c Aldrich 2010, p. 495
  50. ^ a b Aldrich 2010, p. 505
  51. ^ a b c Aldrich 2010, p. 496
  52. ^ Aldrich 2010, p. 9
  53. ^ Aldrich 2010, p. 475
  54. ^ a b Nigel West (31 August 2012). Historical Dictionary of Signals Intelligence. Scarecrow Press. pp. 27–. ISBN 978-0-8108-7391-9.
  55. ^ Aldrich 2010, p. 473
  56. ^ Aldrich 2010, p. 489
  57. ^ "Carillion set for growth". BBC News. 19 September 2000. Archived from the original on 27 February 2009. Retrieved 22 December 2007.
  58. ^ Aldrich, 2010, p. 521
  59. ^ Campbell, Duncan (1981). "Phone tappers and the state". New Statesman: 54.
  60. ^ Aldrich, 2010, p. 471
  61. ^ "'Cavalier' GCHQ online spy centre loses 35 laptops". Computerworld UK. 12 March 2010. Archived from the original on 29 July 2012. Retrieved 12 March 2010.
  62. ^ The Guardian: GCHQ intercepted foreign politicians' communications at G20 summits Archived 18 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine, 16 June 2013
  63. ^ Philip Bump (21 June 2013). "The UK Tempora Program Captures Vast Amounts of Data – and Shares with NSA". The Atlantic Wire. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 23 June 2013.
  64. ^ "Statement on GCHQ's Alleged Interception of Communications under the US PRISM Programme" (PDF). Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament. 17 July 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 April 2023. Retrieved 19 April 2023.
  65. ^ "Scale and significance of NSA snooping claims". BBC. 11 June 2013. Archived from the original on 17 June 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
  66. ^ Ferris (2020), Chapters 14 and 15.
  67. ^ Ackerman, Spencer; Ball, James (28 February 2014). "Optic Nerve: millions of Yahoo webcam images intercepted by GCHQ". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 23 September 2016. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  68. ^ "Snowden Docs: British Spies Used Sex and 'Dirty Tricks'". NBC News. 7 February 2014. Archived from the original on 7 February 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
  69. ^ "The Snowden Files: British Spies Used Sex and 'Dirty' Tricks" (PDF). NBC News Investigations. NBC. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 January 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  70. ^ Robert Hannigan (3 November 2014). "The web is a terrorist's command-and-control network of choice". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
  71. ^ Sam Jones and Murad Ahmed (3 November 2014). "Tech groups aid terror, says UK spy chief". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
  72. ^ David Barrett (4 November 2014). "Tech giants reject GCHQ boss Robert Hannigan's call for deal with government". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 5 November 2014.
  73. ^ a b c Ryan Gallager, Profiled: From Radio to Porn, British Spies Track Web Users' Online Identities Archived 10 September 2021 at the Wayback Machine, The Intercept (25 September 2015).
  74. ^ Croft, Jane (1 December 2015) UK spy agency GCHQ admits it carries out computer hacking Archived 3 December 2015 at the Wayback Machine. Financial Times
  75. ^ Farrell, Henry (16 March 2017) Sean Spicer just suggested that Obama used British intelligence to spy on Trump. Not so much Archived 17 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine. The Washington Post
  76. ^ Blake, Aaron (16 March 2017) Sean Spicer's angry, lonely defense of Trump's wiretapping claim, annotated Archived 17 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine. The Washington Post
  77. ^ "US makes formal apology to Britain after White House accuses GCHQ of wiretapping Trump Tower". The Telegraph. 17 March 2017. Archived from the original on 22 March 2017. Retrieved 17 March 2017.
  78. ^ "White House apologizes to British government over spying claims". CNN. 17 December 2017. Archived from the original on 18 March 2017. Retrieved 17 March 2017.
  79. ^ "GCHQ dismisses 'utterly ridiculous' claim it helped wiretap Trump | US news". The Guardian. 17 March 2017. Archived from the original on 21 April 2019. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  80. ^ Harding, Luke; Kirchgaessner, Stephanie; Hopkins, Nick (13 April 2017). "British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with Russia". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 April 2017. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  81. ^ "British intelligence passed Trump associates' communications with Russians on to US counterparts". CNN. 14 April 2017. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
  82. ^ "GCHQ (@gchq) • Instagram photos and videos". www.instagram.com. Archived from the original on 14 May 2020. Retrieved 1 November 2018.
  83. ^ Weaver, Matthew (31 October 2018). "GCHQ uses Instagram to 'open up world of espionage' to public". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 31 October 2018. Retrieved 1 November 2018.
  84. ^ a b Mayer, Catherine (2016). Charles: the Heart of a King. Ebury Publishing. p. 175. ISBN 978-0-7535-5595-8. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
  85. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Operational Selection Policy OSP8" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 June 2011. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  86. ^ "Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research". University of Bristol. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 30 August 2008.
  87. ^ "CESG Service Catalogue". Archived from the original on 20 August 2015. Retrieved 17 August 2015.
  88. ^ Singh, Simon. "Unsung Heroes of Cryptography". Archived from the original on 5 December 2014. Retrieved 13 June 2012. (Originally published in The Sunday Telegraph)
  89. ^ "James Ellis". www.gchq.gov.uk. Retrieved 17 November 2023.
  90. ^ "Introduction to PKI". www.ncsc.gov.uk. Retrieved 16 November 2023.
  91. ^ "Prehistory of Public Key Cryptography". www.cs.columbia.edu. Retrieved 16 November 2023.
  92. ^ HM Government (1 November 2016). "National Cyber Security Strategy 2016-2021" (PDF). gov.uk. p. 29. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 November 2016. Retrieved 2 November 2016.
  93. ^ Newmark, Peter (1991). About Translation. Multilingual Matters. p. 40. ISBN 1-85359-118-1.
  94. ^ Joint Technical Language Service (1983). Russian-English Military Dictionary (English and Russian ed.). The Stationery Office. ISBN 9780112300199.
  95. ^ "Government Communications Headquarters, Cheltenham; Joint Technical Language Service". National Archives. Archived from the original on 26 February 2018. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
  96. ^ Schmid, Gerhard (11 July 2001). "On the existence of a global system for the interception of private and commercial communications (ECHELON interception system) – Temporary Committee on the ECHELON Interception System, (2001/2098(INI))" (PDF). European Parliament: Temporary Committee on the ECHELON Interception System. p. 194. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 September 2001. Retrieved 27 March 2008.
  97. ^ "The Law". GCHQ. Archived from the original on 13 January 2020. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  98. ^ a b c "GCHQ does not breach human rights, judges rule". BBC. 5 December 2014. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 6 December 2014.
  99. ^ "The Andrew Marr Show Interview: Theresa May, MP Home Secretary" (PDF). BBC. 23 November 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 December 2014. Retrieved 6 December 2014. Well I guess what he's talking about is the fact that for certain aspects and certain of the more intrusive measures that our security service and police have available to them – i.e. Intercept, intercepting people's telephones and some other intrusive measures – the decision is taken by the Secretary of State, predominantly me. A significant part of my job is looking at these warrants and signing these warrants. I think it's... Some people argue that should be to judges....I think it's very important that actually those decisions are being taken by somebody who is democratically accountable to the public. I think that's an important part of our system. I think it's a strength of our system.
  100. ^ "Justice and Security Act 2013". Legislation.co.uk. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  101. ^ "Functions – Key role". The Investigatory Powers Tribunal. Archived from the original on 6 February 2015. Retrieved 6 February 2015.
  102. ^ "Intelligence Commissioners". Archived from the original on 7 January 2014. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
  103. ^ "IPT Ruling on Interception". GCHQ. Archived from the original on 6 February 2015. Retrieved 6 February 2015.
  104. ^ "GCHQ censured over sharing of internet surveillance data with US". BBC. 6 February 2015. Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 6 February 2015.
  105. ^ "UK-US surveillance regime was unlawful 'for seven years'". The Guardian. 6 February 2015. Archived from the original on 6 February 2015. Retrieved 6 February 2015.
  106. ^ "IPT rejects assertions of mass surveillance". GCHQ. 5 December 2014. Archived from the original on 6 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  107. ^ "List of judgments". Investigatory Powers Tribunal. 5 December 2014. Archived from the original on 6 February 2015. Retrieved 7 February 2015. 1. A declaration that the regime governing the soliciting, receiving, storing and transmitting by UK authorities of private communications of individuals located in the UK which have been obtained by US authorities pursuant to Prism and/or Upstream does not contravene Articles 8 or 10 ECHR. 2. A declaration that the regime in respect of interception under ss8(4), 15 and 16 of the Regulation of investigatory Powers Act 2000 does not contravene Articles 8 or 10 ECHR and does not give rise to unlawful discrimination contrary to Article 14, read together with Articles 8 and/or 10 of the ECHR.
  108. ^ "Statement by the Interception of Communications Commissioner's Office (IOCCO) on the publication of the Interception of Communications Commissioner's Report 2014" (PDF). 12 March 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015."Report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner" (PDF). March 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
  109. ^ "Privacy and Security: A modern and transparent legal framework". Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament. 12 March 2015. Archived from the original on 16 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015."UK surveillance 'lacks transparency', ISC report says". BBC. 12 March 2015. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2015."Intelligence and security committee report: the key findings". The Guardian. 12 March 2015. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
  110. ^ "Handful of UK spies accessed private information inappropriately, ISC says". The Guardian. 12 March 2015. Archived from the original on 1 January 2017. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  111. ^ "UK: Unlawful spying on two organisations reinforces need for intelligence services to end mass surveillance". Amnesty International UK. 22 June 2015. Archived from the original on 20 January 2017. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  112. ^ "Case No. IPT/13/132-9/H IN THE INVESTIGATORY POWERS TRIBUNAL" (PDF). The Investigatory Powers Tribunal. 26 February 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 April 2015. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  113. ^ "Legal privilege and the conflicting interests of GCHQ and the IPT". The Guardian. 16 March 2015. Archived from the original on 1 January 2017. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  114. ^ "EU Human Rights Court Finds UK's Intelligence Agency GCHQ Guilty of Violating Privacy Laws | 25 May 2021". The Daily NewsBrief. 25 May 2021. Archived from the original on 25 May 2021. Retrieved 25 May 2021.
  115. ^ "British intelligence service spying on MPs in defiance of laws prohibiting it". The Independent. 23 July 2015. Archived from the original on 1 January 2017. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  116. ^ "Daily Hansard – Debate, 15 July 2014 : Column 697". Parliament of the United Kingdom. 15 July 2014. Archived from the original on 25 October 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  117. ^ Thomas Tamblyn (14 October 2015). "GCHQ Can Monitor Communications Of MPs And Peers Rules Tribunal". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 25 January 2018. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  118. ^ "Approved Judgment" (PDF). Investigatory Powers Tribunal. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 March 2016. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  119. ^ Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984] UKHL 9, [1985] ICR 14, [1985] IRLR 28, [1984] 3 WLR 1174, [1984] 3 All ER 935, [1985] AC 374 (22 November 1984), House of Lords (UK)
  120. ^ "Life at GCHQ | GCHQ". www.gchq-careers.co.uk. Archived from the original on 17 December 2019. Retrieved 5 April 2019.
  121. ^ "How Cheltenham entered America's backyard". New Scientist. 5 April 1984. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
  122. ^ Thorpe, Vanessa (15 November 2014). "Benedict Cumberbatch to inspire the next generation of codebreakers". The Observer. Archived from the original on 3 December 2014. Retrieved 6 December 2014.
  123. ^ "Puzzling entrance to world of spies". BBC News. 13 January 2000.
  124. ^ Caroline Byrne (15 January 2000). "The Spy Who Solved Me". ABC News. Archived from the original on 22 May 2001. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
  125. ^ "Huge response to spy base puzzle". BBC News. 10 July 2004.
  126. ^ Gordon Rayner (4 February 2016). "GCHQ quiz solution: the full answers – but can you understand them?". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022.
  127. ^ Ewen MacAskill (3 August 2018). "I spy ... another fiendishly difficult GCHQ puzzle book". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 21 January 2019. Retrieved 20 January 2019.
  128. ^ Bacon, Thomas (2 January 2019). "The U.K. Government's GCHQ has issued an official response to the Dalek attack in the Doctor Who New Year Special – no need to panic!". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on 15 February 2020. Retrieved 15 February 2020.
  129. ^ Bui, Hoai-Tran (2 January 2019). "'Resolution' Proves All the New 'Doctor Who' Needed Was an Old Villain". /Film. Archived from the original on 15 February 2020. Retrieved 15 February 2020.
  130. ^ "GCHQ sitcom Intelligence starring David Schwimmer airs on Sky One". So Glos. 3 September 2020. Archived from the original on 28 September 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  131. ^ "GCHQ's history told for the first time in Behind the Enigma". www.gchq.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 25 March 2023. Retrieved 8 March 2023.
  132. ^ Morris, Lauren (15 June 2022). "The Undeclared War first look teases tense Simon Pegg and Mark Rylance series". RadioTimes.com. Archived from the original on 15 June 2022. Retrieved 16 June 2022.

Bibliography

  • Aldrich, Richard J. (2010). GCHQ: The Uncensored Story of Britain's Most Secret Intelligence Agency. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0007278473.
  • Ferris, John (2020). Behind the Enigma: The Authorised History of GCHQ. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-5266-0546-7.
  • Johnson, John (1997). The Evolution of British Sigint: 1653–1939. HMSO. ASIN B002ALSXTC.
  • Kahn, David (1991). Seizing the Enigma: The Race to Break the German U-Boats Codes, 1939–1943. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 978-0395427392.
  • Smith, Michael (2001). "GC&CS and the First Cold War". In Smith, Michael; Erskine, Ralph (eds.). Action This Day: Bletchley Park from the Breaking of the Enigma Code to the Birth of the Modern Computer. Bantam Press. ISBN 978-0593049105.
Quelle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_Signals_Organisation