Uncial 09

New Testament manuscript
Beginning of Mark, decorated headpiece and initial
Name	Boreelianus Rheno-Trajectinus
Sign	Fe
Text	Gospels†
Date	c. 875–975
Script	Greek
Found	Johann Boreel
Now at	Utrecht University
Size	28.5 × 22 cm (11.2 × 8.7 in)
Type	Byzantine text-type
Category	V
Hand	careful and elegant
Note	unfoliated

Codex Boreelianus, or its full name Codex Boreelianus Rheno-Trajectinus, is a uncial manuscript of the New Testament Gospels in Greek, written on parchment. It is designated by F^e or 09 in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts, and ε 86 in the von Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts. It is full of gaps, many of which arose between 1751 and 1830. The codex was named Boreelianus after Johannes Boreel (1577–1629), who brought it from the East.

The text of the codex represents the majority of the text (Byzantine text-type), but with numerous alien readings (non-Byzantine). Some of its readings do not occur in any other manuscript (so called singular readings). According to the present textual critics its text is not very important, but it is cited in all modern editions of the Greek New Testament.

The manuscript was brought from the East at the beginning of the 17th century. It was in private hands for over 100 years. Since 1830 it has been housed at the Utrecht University.

The manuscript is a codex (precursor to the modern book), containing the text of the four Gospels on 204 parchment leaves (sized 28.5 × 22 cm (11.2 × 8.7 in)), with numerous gaps.^[1] The text of the existing codex begins with Matthew 9:1 and ends with John 13:34. Luke is even more incomplete. Textual critic Johann J. Wettstein remarked in 1751 that the codex started at Matthew 7:6 and only the folia up to Matthew 8:25 and Mark 11:6–16 were missing.^[2] Hence several folios appear to have gone missing since his time and the present. The gaps of the manuscript include:

Matthew 1:1–9:1; 12:1–44; 13:55–14:9; 15:20–31; 20:18–21:5;

Mark 1:43–2:8; 2:23–3:5; 11:6–26; 14:54–15:5; 15:39–16:19;

Luke – at least 24 gaps (according to Scrivener)^[3]; Based on the CSNTM text tags 1:10-40; 2:14-3:1; 3:22-4:7; 5:13-29; 6:1-7:7; 7:27-36; 8:7-14, 33-50; 9:7-25, 31, 35-43; 9:55-10:12; 10:15-16, 18, 22-33; 11:23-12:5; 12:23; 12:28-13:13; 13:25-14:17; 14:29-15:4; 15:11-12; 15:15-16:2; 17:15-18:13; 18:29-40; 19:37-20:11; 20:22-21:27; 22:4-5, 9, 12, 16, 41; 22:43-23:10; 23:37-50; 24:4, 20-43.

John 3:5–14; 4:23–38; 5:18–38; 6:39–63; 7:28–8:10; 10:32–11:3; 12:14–25; 13:34-end.^[4][5]

The leaves are unbound and are kept in loose quires.^[6] The text is written in the late uncial script of the larger type, in two columns per page, with mostly 19 lines per column.^[1] The graphic writing style of the text (according to palaeography) is close to Codex Seidelianus I.^[4] The letters Η, Μ, Ν, and Π, are square, the letters Ε, Θ, Ο, Σ, and Φ have a round shape.^[7]: 4 The letters Δ, Ε, Θ, Ο, and especially Ψ in cruciform, are of the form characteristic for the late uncial script. Φ is large and bevelled at both ends.^[3] The letters were written by an 'elegant and careful' hand.^[7] The breathings (rough and smooth breathing) and accents (see e.g. Greek diacritics) are given fully and usually correctly.^[3] The breathings are indicated by sigla ⊢ and ⊣, often used in codices from the 9th and 10th century.^[7]: 6 In some cases breathings are given incorrectly (e.g. Matthew 9,7.16).^[7]: 47 The codex has a lot of grammatical errors, like hiatus (e.g. νηστευουσιν in Matthew 9:14, ελεγεν in Matthew 9:21, ειπεν in Matthew 9:22, etc.)^[7]: 47 and inclusion of final nu.^[7]: 7 The error of iotacism occurs infrequently.

The text is divided according to the Ammonian Sections (an early division of the four Gospels into easily referenced sections), with the section number written in the left margin, but there are given without references to the Eusebian Canons (another early section division based on the Ammonian). There is no division according to the chapters (known as κεφαλαια / kephalia), however the titles (known as τιτλοι / titloi) are given at the top of the pages, sometimes also at the bottom.^[8] The capitals at the beginning of the sections stand out in the margin to indicate new sections (as also seen in codices Alexandrinus, Ephraemi, and Basilensis.^[7]: 5 Although there is no division according to the κεφαλαια, the table contents of the chapters (also known as κεφαλαια) are placed before each Gospel (though unknown whether this was true in Matthew, due to missing first few folios). It has some lectionary markings at the margin.^[4]

The headpieces are decorated, with headings written in gold and red ink; in some places nicely decorated initial letters can be found (also in red or gold ink).^[4][8] The Ammonian sections are written in red. The pages are numbered; the Greek quire numbers are still found at the top right of some pages. At the top left of the first page of most quires in the Gospel of Matthew, Arabic quire numbers are found.^[8] There are several different correctors, among which the "first hand" worked on the codex, but the total number of corrections is not high.^[8]

The manuscript employs the nomina sacra (sacred names; an early Christian abbreviation system for names/titles considered sacred) for the following words: ΘΣ / θεος / theos (God), ΙΣ / Ιησους / Iesous (Jesus), ΧΣ / χριστος / christos (Christ), ΚΣ / κυριος / kyrios (Lord), ΥΣ / υιος / huios (Son), ΣΗΡ / σωτηρ / soter (saviour), ΟΥΝΟΣ / ουρανος / ouranos (heaven), ΠΝΑ / πνευμα / pneuma (Spirit), ΠΗΡ / πατηρ / pater (Father), ΜΗΡ / μητηρ / meter (mother), ΑΝΟΣ / ανθρωπος / anthropos (Man), ΣΤΡΣ / σταυρος / stauros (cross), ΔΑΔ / δαυιδ / Dauid (David), ΙΗΛ / ισραηλ / Israel, ΙΛΗΜ / ιερουσαλημ / Ierousalem (Jerusalem). The words at the end of lines are sometimes abbreviated too.^[7]: 5 It uses typographic ligatures.^[7]: 6

• Special features
• 
  Ligatures used in the codex
• 
  Small initial letters
• 
  Large initial letters (decorated)

The Greek text of this codex is considered a representative of the Byzantine text-type, but with a number of singular readings.^[8] According to biblical scholar Bruce M. Metzger, it is a typical Byzantine text.^[9] According to biblical scholars Kurt and Barbara Aland, it agrees with the Byzantine standard text 156 times, and 78 times with the Byzantine when it has the same reading as the original text. It does not support the "original" text against the Byzantine. It has 11 independent or distinctive readings. Alands placed it in Category V of New Testament manuscripts.^[1] It is not a very important codex, but it is an important witness of the Byzantine text-type. Hermann von Soden classified it as Kⁱ (now it is known as textual family E). According to the Claremont Profile Method (a specific analysis of textual data), it has mixed Byzantine text in Luke 1; in Luke 10 and Luke 20 the manuscript is defective.^[10]

Biblical scholar Jodocus Heringa produced a collation of the readings of Codex Boreelianus against the Textus Receptus (the supposed received text used in Western Europe from the 17th century until the end of the 19th century), of which a sampling are below. Before the bracket are the Textus Receptus readings, afterwards those from Codex Boreelianus.^[11]

The words before the bracket are the readings of the K^r (traditional text used in Constantinople and still used by Eastern Orthodox Church), the words after are the readings of the codex.

The earliest history of the manuscript is unknown. The codex is named after Johann Boreel (1577–1629), Dutch Ambassador at the Court of James I of England. There is no record of when Boreel obtained the codex, but it is generally believed that he brought it to the Netherlands from one of his travels to the Middle East.^[9] The connection to Boreel is indicated by textual critic Johann Jakob Wettstein, who was given a partial collation of the codex in 1730. The collation was made by Izaak Verburg, rector of the Amsterdam gymnasium, and contained text from Matthew 7:2 to Luke 11. Wettstein adds that he was not aware of its current location.^[2] Wettstein cited the codex in his Novum Testamentum Graecum (1751), also in these parts, which do not survive to the present day (e.g. Matthew 7:9).^[13] Wettstein designated the codex by siglum F;^[2] textual critic Casper Rene Gregory designated it by F and 09;^[4] and textual critic Hermann von Soden gave it the siglum ε 86.^[14]

After Johann Boreel's death in 1629, the codex itself was in private hands. Boreel's library was sold in 1632, but the manuscript may not have been among the items for sale. It could have remained in the possession of Boreel's family, for example, in the hands of his younger brother, the theologian Adam Boreel (1602–54).^[6] On the front side (known as the recto) of folio 168 is written the monogram NLB with date "February 9, 1756". Dutch notes can found on the front and reverse (known as the verso) sides of page 40, but they are almost illegible.^[6] The codex resurfaced almost two centuries later, in 1823, and was identified as the Boreelianus by the Utrecht professor Jodocus Heringa (1765–1840). Its leaves had become disordered, and some of them were lost. Scrivener even stated: "Few manuscripts have fallen into such unworthy hands".^[3] The manuscript was now in the private hands of Johannes Michaelis Roukens in Arnhem. In a letter of 11 March 1830, Roukens explained that the manuscript had been in the possession of his father, Arend Anton Roukens, who had inherited it from his father, Johannes Michaelis Roukens.^[15]

In 1841 biblical scholar Constantin von Tischendorf wanted to see and examine the codex, but he was only allowed to read Heringa's papers on it,^[15] as himself Heringa was preparing a collation for publication.^[4] Heringa's papers were edited and published by Vinke in 1843 under the title Jodoci Heringa El. Fil: Disputatio de codice Boreeliano, nunc Rheno-Trajectino ab ipso in lucem protracto, which includes a "full and exact" collation of the text.^[3] Though initially having some difficulty gaining permission, textual critic Samuel Prideaux Tregelles examined the codex in 1850.^[3]

Biblical scholar Philipp Schaff in the Introduction to the American Edition of Westcott and Hort's The New Testament in the Original Greek (1881) wrote that it is "not an important manuscript."^[8] The same opinion was given by biblical scholar Frederic G. Kenyon, according to whom the text of the codex has "comparatively little authority".^[16] Despite these opinions, the codex continues to be cited in critical editions of Novum Testamentum Graece. The editions of Nestle-Aland cite the codex from its first verse – i.e. Matthew 9:1 – in its critical apparatus.^[17]

In 1876, paleographer H. Deane dated the manuscript to the 8th century, though Tischendorf and Gregory dated it to the 9th century; Doedes and Tregelles dated it later to the 10th century.^[3] As of 1995, it is dated by the Institute for New Testament Textual Research (INTF) to the 9th century.^[1][18]

The codex has been located in the library of the Utrecht University (shelf number Ms. 1) since 1830.^[1][18] In March 2007, scholar David Trobisch visited Utrecht and viewed the manuscript with a number of colleagues. In October 2007 the manuscript was digitized.^[15]

• List of New Testament uncials
• Textual criticism
• Biblical commentary

• Heringa, Jodocus (1843). Disputatio de Codice Boreeliano, nunc Rheno-Trajectino (H.E. Vinke ed.). Utrecht: Kemink et filium. Archived from the original on 2011-07-19. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
• Hatch, William (1939). The Principal Uncial Manuscripts of the New Testament. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. LXVII (Plate).

• Digital facsimile of the Codex Boreelianus at the Special Collections of the Utrecht University

• Description and History of the Manuscript, by Bart Jaski of the Utrecht University
• Waltz, Robert. "An Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism". A Site Inspired By: The Encyclopedia of New Testament Textual Criticism. Retrieved 2010-11-12.
• Codex Boreelianus Rheno-Trajectinus (F 09). A Fresh Look after 160 Years
• Codex Boreelianus Revisited