Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Terrorism
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Terrorism. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Terrorism|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Terrorism. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
![](Https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2a/Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg/32px-Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg.png)
watch |
List of Terrorism deletion discussions
- First Siege of Samarkhel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsalvageable article, which is totally LLM'd [1] with one line of passing mentions: The Mujahideen managed to seize Samarkhel village east of Jalalabad. Topic is scarcely notable, WP:TNT applies anyways. – Garuda Talk! 23:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and United States of America. – Garuda Talk! 23:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. – Garuda Talk! 00:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Jihobbyist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a neologism, and does not meet our standards for it. There is actually a lot of usage of the term, but it's always referring to it in the context of its creator, and should be merged to the creator of the term, Jarret Brachman. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete for lack of significant coverage. It's hilarious, and I'm a fan of portmanteaux myself (I invented mergetarian in 2008), but as the years have passed, we've become more strict with notability. Bearian (talk) 04:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- 1976 Olympia bombing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cannot find evidence this has independent notability to pass WP:NEVENT. There were a lot of bombings in the Troubles. Unless further coverage exists that proves notability, should be merged to Chronology of Provisional Irish Republican Army actions (1970–1979)#1976 PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Terrorism, and Ireland. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - I've just added a bunch more detail, plus contemporary news references. It's also significant in that this incident caused the Provisional IRA to temporarily pause their bombing campaign in Britain due to the fallout - Alison talk 04:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Alison The contemporary news sources don't really help it pass NEVENT. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- I believe the fact that the Provos paused their campaign for some time adds to the uniqueness of this particular bombing - Alison talk 04:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Well, that's currently uncited. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- I believe the fact that the Provos paused their campaign for some time adds to the uniqueness of this particular bombing - Alison talk 04:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Alison The contemporary news sources don't really help it pass NEVENT. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - While, yes, there were a "lot of bombings in the Troubles" (and not all meet WP:NEVENT for standalone titles), my own WP:BEFORE search has thrown up at least a few sources which suggest some lasting relevance. I've added these (and related text) to the article. Including two from Yonah Alexander. One of which is framed more as correlation rather than causation (in terms of drop-off in IRA activity). While the other is more clearly framed as causation (in terms of drop-off in support from Qadhafi). The pre-existing Nationwide source/report, in which John Stapleton (timestamp 1m20s) speaks about the "[IRA's] latest line in explosive hardware" (and George Styles subsequently talks about its relevance) are also, IMO, contributory... Guliolopez (talk) 11:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - Notable event with numerous weighty mentions in a number of reliable sources. - SchroCat (talk) 10:15, 15 February 2025 (UTC)