For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blogs19/Archive.

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.

– This SPI case is open.

• 2001:4490:880:F73B:0:0:0:1 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2001:4490:88B:97A6:0:0:0:1 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

After the AfD for Susovan Roy closed (see here), this IP editor (same person) has reached out to me directly to ask about how to REFUND the article (see here and here). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:55, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• I'd guess that already-existing block on the /42 from user talk space is the relevant one. Really the only question is whether to nix TPA as a result of this disruption. Daniel Case? Izno (talk) 22:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I suppose if they keep doing this, yes. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]