Suspected sockpuppets

• Ced920 (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Dina tibbs (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 108.104.88.246 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 174.51.80.102 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 63.228.82.116 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 65.101.218.151 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 67.21.128.51 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 76.25.25.212 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 99.201.188.83 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 99.201.84.150 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

• Exact same edits in months long edit war, all of which have been reverted by multiple experienced editors.

• Prior warning that seems to have been ignored.

• User notified of this SPI, and the reverting editors notified as well.

• See: Oscillococcinum history -- Brangifer (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Declined, and here's why. Dina tibbs is stale, so CU wouldn't give us data on that account. The privacy policy won't allow CU to tie editors to accounts, so it wouldn't get us anything anyway. That really only leaves AshKmorse and Ced920. There's actually no overlap in the two accounts, and there isn't actual malicious use of accounts here. Of the IPs listed, only a few have edited recently, but even then the latest was eleven days ago, making it a little too far out to be worth any sort of blocking. For now I would say keep an eye on this case and report any new findings a bit faster. At the very least we could perhaps justify page protection, or something. I've warned the master account again about logging in, but I guess we'll see what happens. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 16:51, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• Ddscchavez (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tomd.dds (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 75.145.122.81 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

• Exact same edits in months long edit war, all of which have been reverted by multiple experienced editors. A previous SPI case was closed as stale, although at least two IPs had been active recently. Please see previous case. This needs to stop. -- Brangifer (talk) 03:31, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Brangifer (talk) 03:31, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Semi protection of the article for a few weeks may be in order.--McSly (talk) 03:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Semi would help, although I'd expect another sock to arrive and get around that. This problem is a fairly persistent one. bobrayner (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

•  Clerk endorsed - I warned the master last time about socking. CU will help determine what's going on. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:01, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • All of the named accounts are  Likely matches - they are in the same city and two of the accounts share the same computer. No comment on the IP. TNXMan 15:51, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Administrator note AshKmorse blocked 1 week. All other accounts blocked indef. Oscillococcinum semi-protected. Elockid ^(Talk) 01:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot to mention. IP is autoblocked. Elockid ^(Talk) 01:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• KatrinaRusso (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Exact same edit on same article, same puppeteer as User:Tomd.dds. old edit and new edit. — raekyt 21:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Administrator note Per WP:DUCK I've blocked and tagged the sock, and blocked AshKmorse for a month for puppeting. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 21:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppets

• 76.25.25.212 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

AshKmorse back at Oscillococcinum, it appears, this time as an ip — raekyt 01:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Administrator note I've blocked the IP for 1 month for evasion. And I've blocked AshKmorse indefinitely for evasion, puppeting and general disruption. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]