The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the discussion's talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed as clear violation, email address ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 02:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note After realizing this name predates the e-mail rule, I took a closer look. Renegade cash is a commercial website. So I am letting this block stand. ^High_InBC^{(Need help? Ask me)} 13:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 [view]

Username resembles an email address. Johnny Au 02:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I have re-opened this. The change in policy making the blocking of old email addresses mandatory was UNDISCUSSED. [1] Nardman1 04:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The edit summary is "see talk"? I've watched the talk page, and I've seen discussions over things like religious user names, but NOTHING like the massive page over haul that was introduced here. Nardman1 04:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems I did miss the policy change, but for some reason I didn't think it was going to actually change policy, just simplify it. Nardman1 04:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • The grandfather clause for old e-mail address usernames was indeed lost. I don't think this was intentional. -SpuriousQ (talk) 04:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the entries talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.