The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Mouldavia → Discworld (world)#Sentient species  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Could also be a typo for Moldavia as Mold is known as Mould in British English 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 21:16, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Leaning keep? I could find a reference to it on Discworld. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 21:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Term appears at target article, so it could be helpful for some readers. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:07, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Mentioned in the target. I've never seen Moldova or the like spelled with a "u" in the UK. The town in Wales is always spelled Mold, and I've never seen confusion there either; the redirect Mould, Flintshire has never existed. Narky Blert (talk) 09:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Urbanus. Deryck C. 19:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Urbanus (comics) → Urbanus (comic strip)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Technical request; An editor in the recent move discussion expressed concern that the redirect may be ambiguous, thus violating WP:RFD#D2. Sceptre (talk) 20:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Urbanus, which already has a disambiguating hatnote. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• $PLC → Southern Poverty Law Center  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Appears to be a satiric misspelling not mentioned in the article, at least for me, the first several pages of a Google search for this string didn't bring up anything about the SPLC, so this doesn't seem to have any sort of real usage. Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There seems to be no reason for the inclusion of the "$" sign in title. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Narky Blert (talk) 09:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non inclusion on google 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• MankDonalds → McDonald's  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Only usage of this phrase I can find is in reference to a NN comic book panel. No evidence this is actually used to refer to the target organization. Hog Farm (talk) 19:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Useless, implausible redirect. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree, also delete per nom. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:12, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Narky Blert (talk) 09:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• VirusBarrier X4 → Intego#Products  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Virus Barrier X4 → Intego#Products  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• VirusBarrier X5 → Intego#Products  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• VirusBarrier X6 → Intego#Products  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• VirusBarrier Server → Intego#Products  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• VirusBarrier Mail Gateway → Intego#Products  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Versions not mentioned at target. I know these are redirects, but these are pushing WP:NOTCATALOG/WP:NOTCHANGELOG. All of X4-X6 are remnants of a series of page moves with version updates until settling on VirusBarrier, which was later merged to the company page. None appear to be useful based on the traffic, and there are no incoming links. I have spared VirusBarrier and Virus Barrier (though the latter is incorrect and doesn't appear to be used at all, either), which should be sufficient to capture all variations since they're not actually mentioned. -- 2pou (talk) 18:32, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Unless someone finds another more suitable target. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ambedkar Istitute Of Advanced Communication Technologies and Research → Ambedkar Institute of Advanced Communication Technologies and Research  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• St Denys Theological Istitute → St. Dionysius Institute in Paris  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not sure how plausible this misspelling of "institute" is, for example since these pages didn't get a lot of pageviews compared to their targets and/or correctly spelled counterparts since July 2015. Also, the St. Denys one was the result of a move away from the typo back in June 2008. Regards, SONIC678 17:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – what is to be gained by deleting these redirects other than readers annoyed at their misspelling? — J947 ^[cont] 18:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unambiguously created in error. The gain in deletion is ridding WP of useless misspelt clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 18:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • These aren't entirely useless; why is ridding WP of useless misspelt clutter helpful to the encyclopedia? — J947 ^[cont] 19:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Useless misspelt clutter is useless, as said in your statement. It doesn't need to exist. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 18:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • It isn't useless; anyone who searches this up (and they sure have) will be helped. — J947 ^[cont] 20:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:R3. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • But this redirect was created eight years ago, therefore WP:R3 doesn't apply here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's still useless nonetheless. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:28, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unambiguously created in error, useless clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 09:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Striking accidental duplicate vote. — J947 ^[cont] 20:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Christma Carol → Christmas carol  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

What? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, perhaps a typo when creating? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedily delete per WP:R3. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:34, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • R3 is only for recently created redirects. — J947 ^[cont] 18:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's still useless nonetheless. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Also pretty much nonsense. I tried translating the very first page in the history and got: CHRISTMA CAROL there is no such tradition in Brazil Carols are always sung. -2pou (talk) 18:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• (edit conflict) Keep; it's perfectly plausible to miss one letter. It's unambiguous, so what is to be gained by deleting this redirect? — J947 ^[cont] 18:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unambigousl create i erro. Narky Blert (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. It's useless but I do agree that it's also unambiguous. What else could this refer to? CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• National taiwan uiversity of science and technology → National Taiwan University of Science and Technology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete this one for the same reason as these other three with the questionably plausible misspelling... Regards, SONIC678 14:40, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedily delete per WP:R3. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:35, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • At least read R3 before you reference it; the criteria applies to recently created redirects only. — J947 ^[cont] 18:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still useless anyway. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as helpful and harmless. See RHARMFUL. — J947 ^[cont] 18:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Misspelt, miscapitalised and useless. This should be uncontroversial; see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 10#Tri-State Uiversity for a recent precedent. Narky Blert (talk) 19:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This isn't useless; it's helpful, albeit only very slightly so. What is to be gained by deleting this redirect? — J947 ^[cont] 19:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Cold Hearted (song). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Cold Hearted (song) → Cold Hearted (Seven Lions and Kill the Noise song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The redirect is confusing as it does not redirect to the most well-known song named "Cold Hearted" (the '80s Paula Abdul song that was a number-one hit on the Billboard Hot 100). The redirect should either be deleted as it is confusing. It could also be redirected to the Paula Abdul song. Jigglypoof21 (talk) 06:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Cold Hearted as nom suggests. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguation Turn into a disambig page maybe? --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep per WP:RENOM, a discussion for this redirect was just closed today. If you disagree with the close, take it up with the closer, and then use WP:DRV if you still can't come to an agreement. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• High Exit-Only Turnstile → Turnstile  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete as unused and unlikely. The one keep suggestion at previous discussion does not provide a plausible rationale for such a poorly styled redirect even if a High exit-only turnstile redirect could conceivably be useful. Dicklyon (talk) 04:18, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Note: Redirect High exit-only turnstile created. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 18:50, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• GTFGK → Grizzly Tales for Gruesome Kids  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The page of the media it is redirecting to (Grizzly Tales for Gruesome Kids) has never been referred to this acronym in any of the citations featured in the franchise. MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 13:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore, I nominate Delete MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Note that Grizzly Tales for Gruesome Kids does seem to be the primary topic for GTFGK. — J947 ^[cont] 01:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Leaning keep. While usage for this initialism is sparse, it is out there. I don't see anything else noteworthy this could refer to, so I doubt someone would be surprised where they ended up if searching this. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Tavix. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 16:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• NBA Horse Challenge → Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sports#North America 3  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not currently mentioned at the target, delete unless a due mention is added. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Why would anyone relist such a useless item? Dicklyon (talk) 04:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I don't see what this has to do with the target. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:11, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This is referring to a league sponsored Horse tournament since the NBA season was cancelled, and the players play Horse on their own courts. [1] (Sporting newsworthy, but still not mentioned at target--and the targeted section was wrong). -2pou (talk) 18:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.