Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 August 11

August 11

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 11, 2010

Saft Groupe S.A.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect to unrelated company. Only relation is a joint venture in Milwaukee Marcus Qwertyus 20:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Keystone Building (Aurora, Illinois)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy closed since this has been converted to an article and is therefore out of the scope of RFD. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who will search for a building? WikiCopterRadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - good work! Go ahead and boldly move it over the redirect. Converting redirects to notable, sourced articles can be done at any time and is a 'Good Thing'. Once it is an article, this RFD will be speedy closed since the page would then be out of scope and the RFD moot. Bridgeplayer (talk) 23:42, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Moved. Let me know if anyone has a problem with this action. :) Thanks. Avicennasis @ 00:26, 4 Elul 5770 / 14 August 2010 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Hotel Aurora

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was converted to disambiguation page; now out of scope of RFD. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who will search for a hotel? WikiCopterRadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Graham Building

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was converted to disambiguation page; now out of scope of RFD. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who will search for a building? WikiCopterRadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Stolp Woolen Mill Store

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep --Taelus (Talk) 14:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who will search for a mill store? WikiCopterRadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Aurora Elks Lodge No. 705

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep Taelus (Talk) 14:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who will search for a lodge? WikiCopterRadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Create footballer wiki

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Syrthiss. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect left over from an incorrectly-named new article -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as speedy under WP:CSD#R3 (implausible typo). No need to have a discussion about it. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Cold shoulder (phrase)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. fetch·comms 01:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term, cold shoulder (phrase) moved to primary cold shoulder creating this vestige. Si Trew (talk) 10:53, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Shante Broadus

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retargeted to Snoop Dogg#Personal life. Non-controversial retargeting. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is Snoop Dogg's wife. There was an AfD last year that ended in the article being redirected to Doggystyle, but that doesn't make sense to me. It should instead be re-targeted to Snoop Dogg's article. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Roger D. Allen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an unnecessary redirect. If someone wanted to search for this person, they wouldn't find any information about this guy as he is not mentioned in the target article. Tavix |  Talk  04:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia:FOOTBALLPLAYERWHOSHALLNOTBENAMED

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. fetch·comms 01:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't already know the history, but thought it was enough of a BLP issue for someone to figure out the history.   — Jeff G.  ツ 18:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the "it's only a BLP issue if you already know the history" argument only works if you assume nobody else will search to try to figure out the history. To the contrary, human nature means that it is probably more likely that this secretive long-cut will invite people to try to figure out who you are referring to.  7  03:56, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (as PROD decliner, though it shouldn't really matter since PROD is not for redirects...) Assertions that this are a BLP issue are themselves disruptive WP:CRYBLP. It's useful, used, humorous, and no policy-based argument for its deletion has been advanced. No WP:R#DELETE apply, and WP:R#KEEP #5 applies at a minimum. Jclemens (talk) 04:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Plaxico was deleted on BLP grounds in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Plaxico (2nd nomination).   — Jeff G.  ツ 18:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Jeff attempted to add this redirect to the page's shortcut box (which already exceeded the coded limit of five), and I explained that "an unwieldy shortcut created as a joke should not listed." He apparently misunderstood this to mean that the shortcut shouldn't exist (and immediately requested its deletion).
    While it isn't suitable for inclusion in the shortcut box, it seems entirely harmless to me. The BLP policy is important, but applying it here is quite a stretch.
    David Levy 07:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Plaxico was deleted on BLP grounds in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Plaxico (2nd nomination).   — Jeff G.  ツ 18:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And probably rightfully so, but this one en't that one. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Wikipedia:FOOTBALLPLAYERWHOSHALLNOTBENAMED" is an obscure meta-reference to that situation. Even if someone goes to the trouble of tracking down its origins, this would merely establish that Mr. Burress was ribbed in the past (the same information conveyed via that archived deletion debate). Keep in mind that he did not shoot himself in the foot, so unlike a redirect bearing his name, there is no direct connection to the individual. —David Levy 22:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

11:59

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy close Not a deletion issue, easily converted to dab. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One batOne hammer) 01:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

deletion; created an article 11:59 (Ryan Star album) which is difficult to search with this redirect - WP:RFD#DELETE :1 --Sk4170 (talk) 00:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.