The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saynotomethandbareback.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source page on Flickr states the license to be non-commercial Simon Speed (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ibrahimovic FBK Balkan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Purports to be image of Zlatan Ibrahimovic as a youth, but date is shown as December 2009. No evidence to support claim that this is the uploader's own work. Mosmof (talk) 03:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IbrahimovicHouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be taken from here: http://santoswelove.blogspot.com/2008/03/zlatan-ibrahimovics-house.html

No evidence uploader owns copyright. Mosmof (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HKGolferCover1002.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Magazine cover but licensed under uploaders' release. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 05:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is the publisher. Please leave it alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nottageek (talk • contribs) 03:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crushed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• from http://www.dalstonmillfabrics.co.uk/prodimages/8010/1.jpg but licensed under uploader's release. Racconish ^Tk 06:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sugardian angel training.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• At least 4 tineye matches Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nadey Hakim Spire.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Reffered because source apparently listed is not nessacirly the uploader's image to release (even though it's likely to be OF them) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picture 5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Product artwork - No date indication given Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:28, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• File was renamed since being listed - now is File:Bicycle Brand playing cards.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs). --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 22:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steve mcclanahan training photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Duplicate of image ALREADy reffered Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mllk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File is retrieved from artists myspace site. No indication that it was uploaded by the copyright owner noq (talk) 11:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opoko--.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File is retrieved from artists myspace site. No indication that it was uploaded by the copyright owner noq (talk) 11:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cranbrook Celestial Sculpture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Freedom of panorama in the US only covers buildings not statues . IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cranbrook School Quadrangle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• same as above, the statue is in the middle IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• keep de minimis applies here. — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SsRepublic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image was listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 January 29, but we do not handle images there. It is taken from [1]. The tagger did not specify, but I suspect the problem here is that while the image is hosted on a US military website, it is a 1948 painting evidently by a civilian that they are hosting courtesy of its copyright holder. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neyo Inmyownwords.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Album cover, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξ^xplicit 19:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amazon Web Services logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not simple enough to be in the public domain. Also, a fair use SVG version is available. Quibik (talk) 21:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Any version of the logo should be equally fair use, but now that there's an SVG version available, it should probably supersede the PNG version. —Piet Delport (talk) 2010-02-07 08:40
• Delete PNG version. I cannot see a court saying that the boxes are original enough as they are used in many other logos. While it certainly is trademarked, I do not believe copyright applies in this instance. — BQZip01 — ^talk 19:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.