Wikipedia:Gatekeeping
In the context of Wikipedia editing, gatekeeping is attempting to control who can contribute to the encyclopaedia or what kind of contributions they are allowed to make. Gatekeeping is disruptive because it contradicts Wikipedia's third and fourth pillars: that anyone can edit and that editors should treat each other with respect and civility. It damages the health of the community by deterring new editors, alienating existing ones, and inhibiting the preservation and incremental improvement of encyclopaedic content. When targeted at a specific editor, it can be a form of harassment.
Preventing damage to the project by banning disruptive editors or removing inappropriate content is not gatekeeping, as long as it is aligned with the consensus of the Wikipedia community. These activities can become gatekeeping if conducted unilaterally, aggressively and/or without a reasonable expectation of the support of the broader community. Administrators have a special role in handling disruption on the community's behalf and consequently are held to a higher standard of conduct to ensure that performing their duties does not devolve into arbitrary gatekeeping.
Gatekeeping behaviours
Indicators of gatekeeping include:
- Attempting to prevent another editor from editing through threats, hounding or other forms of harassment rather than following community processes for resolving conduct disputes
- Asserting ownership of a particular item of content or project process
- Insisting that a particular editor or group of editors must approve contributions from other editors in advance
- Insisting that content must meet a particular policy, guideline, or other standard before it is added or restored, without a consensus of editors that this standard applies
- Engaging in excessive us and them rhetoric with regard to a particular content area, process, or dispute
Dealing with gatekeeping
Gatekeeping on Wikipedia displays a wide spectrum of severity. On the one hand, deliberate gatekeeping directed at specific people is harassment and grounds for an immediate block. But it is more common to see unintentional gatekeeping that grow out of a good faith feeling of responsibility over a specific item of content or the encyclopaedia as a whole. In such cases try to gently remind the editor that we work within a community of peers and encourage them to take a break from problematic areas. Directly accusing somebody of gatekeeping (such as by linking to this page) is rarely helpful.
Community-mediated conduct forums are available as a last resort. Historically, entrenched gatekeeping behaviours have been a feature of many conduct-related arbitration cases.