The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 11. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:59, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ExpressRailMTR.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slowdance marcyhunson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gen. Quon ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not discussed critically nor necessary for understanding--it's just decoration in an infobox. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it appears the page wasn't really read. From the article: "Series character and prop supervisor Benjamin Anders designed Marceline's look and outfit for this episode. On his personal Tumblr, he wrote, '[Adam Muto] asked me if I wanted to design a couple looks for Marceline for the episode and ended up going with a Yolandi Visser/Lady Gaga look.'" This is then explicitly invoked and discussed on the the file's page: "Marceline's design is discussed in the "Production" section of the article, and this image—which clearly shows Marceline—allows a reader to see what the text is conveying." Pure description is a little hard to convey something like "a Yolandi Visser/Lady Gaga look", so it certainly is helpful to the reader, and thus is not just decoration.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then I would recommend moving it to the appropriate place in the article. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Having it in the infobox is standard practice in many other TV-related articles.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lough Derravaragh & Lough Lene.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Peter gavigan ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lough Derravaragh & Lough Lene.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - it is arguable what he means by "not for sale", but whatever he meant by it, if it was generated with someone else's computer software, then he doesn't own the copyright to it. --B (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 11. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hon.Felix Dias Bandaranaike.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 September 11. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2 up 2 down with central staircase.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Condolences of Sheikh Mujib on death of Abdul Malek.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Husain007 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned newspaper clipping. PD-ineligible is wrong. The article is from Dainik Sambad, which is in India. I'm not sure if it would be 60 years from publication or life plus 60, but either way it's still copyrighted if this is from 1969. B (talk) 20:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Images of copyrightable text are not PD-ineligible. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 20:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a copyrighted text. ( B "The general rule is that copyright lasts for 60 years. In the case of original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works the 60-year period is counted from the year following the death of the author." So I believe 60 years from the date of publication is applicable here.)--DBigXrayᗙ 21:51, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Driveuplightedsign.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nostaljack ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is a photo of a lighted Chi-Chi's sign. Seven years ago, there was an IFD in which the uploader said that he is the photographer. [1]. Unfortunately, however, when he uploaded it, he tagged it as fair use and at no point - neither in the IFD nor on his talk page - offer a free license for it. Someone else tagged it as PD-ineligible, but photo of 3D object incurs a separate copyright. B (talk) 20:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reddit logo and wordmark.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Svgalbertian ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Old Reddit logo. It was deleted at commons because the Common Public Attribution License is not considered to be sufficiently free. (The current Reddit logo is being used under a claim of fair use.) If the license is not sufficiently free for Commons, then it's not sufficiently free for us. (The only "free" images we take that Commons doesn't is images that are copyrighted in their home country but PD in the US.) B (talk) 20:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.