The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Girl in the Big Ten.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Life on the fast lane.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milhousedensity.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisasdatewithdensity.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsons 8F05.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:FABF06.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This image doesn't seem terribly necessary to the text: Bart as Mozart looks like, well, what you would expect Bart as Mozart to look like. Mangoe (talk) 16:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marge vs. Singles, Seniors, Childless Couples and Teens, and Gays.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Francisco97 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MargeGetsAJob.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marge Simpson in Screaming Yellow Honkers scene.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Registered user 92 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marge On The Lam.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) This does make reference to other media, but is hardly necessary for understanding and is not contrasted with media which it is referencing. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Last Exit to Springfield scene.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Registered user 92 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Thousand Monkeys.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 5F05.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — the image appears to depict the main plot element (skeleton of angel) around which the episode revolves. As there is no non-free alternative, suggest retention, but revise caption or image description to indicate the centrality of the image to the episode's content. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — ξ^xplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisainthefuture.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The image in question shows the redesigns of two major characters for the episode. The redesigns are discussed at length in the article, and the image helps aid the readers' understanding of these designs. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 20:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "Everything in the episode had to be redesigned, which included new sets and all of the characters had to be remodeled for their age.[6] In most cases, the adults were made heavier, had a few lines added to the face and less hair. On Homer, the redesign was minimal, making him a bit heavier, removing one hair and placing an extra line under the eye.[6]" Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Nom ignored extensive discussion in article prose. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — I would support inclusion of an image related to the fortune teller incident, but the relatively generic father-of-the-bride plot-line-possible scenario does not enhance the reader's understanding beyond the title of the episode. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escalator to Nowhere.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — The "escalator to nowhere" is not mentioned in the article other than in the caption of the image. If there were a relevant passage related to this artifact in the article, I would support inclusion; in the absence of such a passage, there is not justification for retaining the image. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:9f02.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CTF83! ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MilhouseNdCoastGuards.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thenewmilhouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Savingsimpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons PABF14.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BSRF ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lost Our Lisa.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chris6730 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep here (but file has no rationale for new location at present and will be tagged as such.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lts2.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xihix ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — I have moved the image from the episode article Lisa the Simpson to the aggregation article Simpson family. This would appear to be a relatively unique image showing many characters and is illustrative of the male members of the family as a whole. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I would agree that the new location makes this image more useful. Mangoe (talk) 13:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lts1.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xihix ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisa's Rival Fugitive.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This image makes plain the reference to The Fugitive and is thus educational. Mangoe (talk) 16:29, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 3G02.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisa's Rival.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GABF05.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oh Brother Where Art Thou.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Keyser Söze ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burns on the 19th century woodcut.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Darth Kalwejt ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Mother the Carjacker.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Keyser Söze ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Kid On The Block.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BartMina.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mysistermysitter.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr. Sprintz.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Holiday56 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milhouse of Sand and Fog scene.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandandfog united.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ocgang simpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oklahoma simpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moe Letter Blues.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mohojohn ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GABF01.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milhouse Doesn't Live Here Anymore.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jangelt ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BenderSimpsons.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mountain of Madness.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HomerTows.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teletubbies11x15.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Big Fat Geek Wedding.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Million Dollar Abie.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by IRbaboon ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MoaningLisa.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mrom ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr plow ad.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mriya ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:FABF16.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GABF07.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:DaDeath.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mothersimpson.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homer and Mona.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The image shows the redesigns of two major characters, which is discussed at length in the article. The image helps the readers' understanding of those designs. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 20:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response Could this not be conveyed adequately with text? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"A picture is worth a thousand words." Obama's image could easily be described in text too. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 14:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response And any images of Obama in his article are freely-licensed. I don't understand your point. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "Mona Simpson was designed in a way so that she has little bit of Homer in her face, such as the shape of her upper lip and her nose.[6] There were several design changes because the directors were trying to make her an attractive older and younger woman, but still be Simpson-esque." Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response Then the image needs to accompany that portion of the text and it needs to be either taken out of the other article where it is used or that critical explanation needs to be applied there. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But that's not what your deletion rationale says. Your rationale claims that the image is decorative, not that it's used in the wrong location. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 21:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. PLEASE ADD NFUR for each article where image is used! --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MotherSimpson2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jjatsimpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpongebobSimpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F6 by Zscout370 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selma's Choice 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zscout370 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsons episode for wikipedia article.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tellyaddict ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpson and Delilah.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Voltex115 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:She of Little Faith.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Postcards From The Wedge.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TEHCHUCKLEBROTHERS ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skinner's Sense of Snow.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1811-Simpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sumanthjv ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SBLG War Room.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The image illustrates a moment discussed in the text. It shows a reference to the movie Dr. Strangelove, and the image helps the reader understand this reference. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 20:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Response The Simpsons has dozens of spoofs and sight gags every episode and although non-free media that illustrate each of them are helpful in understanding, it must be significantly educational to pass fair use guidelines. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Nom ignored discussion of the scene in the article prose, against policy. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This image makes plain the reference to Dr. Strangelove and is thus educational for some value of "educational". Mangoe (talk) 16:26, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bob's Last Gleaming.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Realty Bites.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CTF83! ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rome-old and Juli-eh.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SoWhy ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GABF21.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Classtruggle.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theleftorium ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep You're obviously mass-nominating screenshots for deletion without even bothering to see if they pass NFCC#8. This one does, as the design of Marge's dress is discussed in the article. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Response Of course it's discussed, but this image is not critical for readers' understanding. If (e.g.) there was a picture of Kennedy wearing it and then one of Marge for comparison, that would be different. As it stands, we only have the one, so we can't actually compare how similar they are. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • You're ignoring this part of the article:

The show's creator, Matt Groening, was worried that such a detailed dress would look "weird" on a Simpsons character because they are "simply designed" and their clothing is "very generic".[5] He ended up liking the design, though, and Dietter thought it looked "good" on Marge. Oakley also liked the design and thought the cut on Marge was "flattering".[4] The country club women's clothes were changed in every scene, something Dietter thought was hard to do because the animators had to come up with new designs.

• Theleftorium ^(talk) 15:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Nom ignored discussion of image and image topic in article prose. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsons Roasting.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosebud (The Simpsons).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpson Tide.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:STVillage People.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reservoir Cats.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsoncalifragilisticexpiala(Annoyed Grunt)cious.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SmokeLisa.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PeanutShrimp.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PleaseHomerDontHammerEm.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:QuimbyBobDebate.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SimpsonsAllThePresidentsMen.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regarding Margie.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dspserpico ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rasahggitcotfh.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rednecks and Broomsticks.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dungcamed2010 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Springfield Connection (Simpsons episode - screenshot).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The wub ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]