The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:European motto unite dans la diversite may 5 2000 bruxels (Small).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Cliché Online ( | contribs | uploads).

• WP:NFCC#8. No need for this image. Rettetast (talk) 10:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Yep, simply no need. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harper Finkle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hoangquan hientrang ( | contribs | uploads).

• According to WP:NFLISTS, images which show the whole cast of a show are preferred to individual shots of each actor where non-free content is concerned. This image is used in List of Wizards of Waverly Place characters where the non-free image File:WOWPcast2.jpg shows the whole cast. Image doesn't meet the NFC guideline I think, nor (if considered without the guidelines) WP:NFCC #3 and #8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theresa Russo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hoangquan hientrang ( | contribs | uploads).

• According to WP:NFLISTS, images which show the whole cast of a show are preferred to individual shots of each actor where non-free content is concerned. This image is used in List of Wizards of Waverly Place characters where the non-free image File:WOWPcast2.jpg shows the whole cast. Image doesn't meet the NFC guideline I think, nor (if considered without the guidelines) WP:NFCC #3 and #8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jerry Russo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hoangquan hientrang ( | contribs | uploads).

• According to WP:NFLISTS, images which show the whole cast of a show are preferred to individual shots of each actor where non-free content is concerned. This image is used in List of Wizards of Waverly Place characters where the non-free image File:WOWPcast2.jpg shows the whole cast. Image doesn't meet the NFC guideline I think, nor (if considered without the guidelines) WP:NFCC #3 and #8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:UW Phases.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by AustinBrister ( | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned. Only page to use this photo was deleted at AFD, then the userfied version was deleted at MFD. Hairhorn (talk) 21:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No need for this, orphaned image. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:NeetpromoRyeRye1.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Lifebonzza ( | contribs | uploads).

• Fails WP:NFCC#8, there's no need for a non-free image in the articles of the recording artist and record label to show that a promotional single was released. — ξ^xplicit 23:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clearly being used for "decoration" and not being used for any sort of critical commentary. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Absolutely per Soundvisions1. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hannah Montana The Movie poster.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ipodnano05 ( | contribs | uploads).

• Image is sourced from http://impawards.com/2009/hannah_montana_the_movie.html and reduced but the colour has been manipulated making it a derivative work, which is not permitted under doctrines of fair use, as per this post at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests. Image is redundant to File:Hannah-montana-movie-poster.jpg, which was the image previously used at Hannah Montana: The Movie. AussieLegend (talk) 23:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this. The colors are not manipulated and I'm sure that whatever was posted is just meaning that in the sense I can't turn a the Hannah Montana logo from gold and purple to orange and green. You're just looking for any random reason to get your way even though it has been discussed and the png version was chosen. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was the wrong url. I have corrected it so you can see that the colors are not manipulated. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Before I asked about manipulating colours in non-free images at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#Manipulation of non-free content I found an identical version here confirming the colouring. As for the png version being "chosen", it's only Ipodnano05 who wishes to change the image from the original, but that's a discussion for the article talk page, not here. --AussieLegend (talk) 00:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Either or - meaning we don't need two versions of this poster. Currently this one is unused so it fails Criteria 7. It could also be tagged with {{Di-orphaned fair use}}. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:38, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.