The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep as a bad faith nomination from yet another sock-puppet, with no other editors opining delete. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Uncle G 11:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not as notable as ED, which was mentioned in MSNBC news. Even more of anti-Wikipedia site. Sessionjoyment, Hamheim 23:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep 'not as notable' doesn't mean the same as 'not notable'. --Thespian 09:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I noticed that the author, who has all of three edits, did not follow the complete procedure and link the page from the Log, this should just be ditched. We've had enough of this this week. --Thespian 10:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.