The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vicky Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't satisfy criteria detailed at WP:CREATIVE (which covers journalists). ƒ(Δ)² 14:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom, it doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 23:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.