Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The K-Otics
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . This allows the possibiilty of article restoration should sources be located. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The K-Otics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Borderline on WP:BAND. Hard to say, as the main source in the article is this blog. Possibly passes #11, as the article states the band got heavy rotation on WBAM; I'm not sure if this is considered a "major radio" network. Also potentially passes #5, as they had one single released on Bang Records, and another single potentially(?) released on FAME Records (if FAME can be considered a "major record label"). Ambiguity could be cleared up if I could find online sources, but there are few ([1]). Perhaps someone has access to other media to help this article pass notability guidelines. Mbdfar (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is all I can find and it's not a RS [2] but it describes the group as having a regional fame. There are likely some old paper sources that could be used to source this article, but I really don't want to dig them up; I can't find any sourcing we can use at present. Oaktree b (talk) 03:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.