Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Egg and chips
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination was withdrawn by the creator now that he nominated a correct article. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Talk:Egg and chips (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Egg and chips|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
'Egg and chips' is no more notable than 'Ham, eggs and chips' or 'Sausage, eggs, chips and beans'. Or any number of different fry-up ingredients, such as bacon, black pudding, mushrooms, kippers and kidneys. The article also seems dedicated to showing that egg and chips is a working-class dish. It's no more working-class than toast and jam; it's just simple food that everyone eats. Reforming the article to remove this bias would render it no more than a stub; hence nominate for deletion. MrDemeanour (talk) 12:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- If you want the article deleted, the template (and this discussion) needs to be on the article title, not the talk page. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 13:10, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oh dear. Thanks - this is only my second afd nom - and I did the previous one entirely by hand (which was painful). MrDemeanour (talk) 13:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- So I withdraw this nomination; I have now nominated the actual article (is there more that I need to do to withdraw a nom?) MrDemeanour (talk) 14:45, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.