Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runway theatre company
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger One ping only 09:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Runway theatre company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. WP:SPAM and WP:NOTMEMORIAL also apply. The article was created by the theatre company or someone closely associated with it, who also admits(on the article's talk page) the article is to 'promote the legacy of of founding member'. Most sources for the article company are the theater itself.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ...William 15:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. ...William 15:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC) ...William 15:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I have done a search of the national press and media - I found this right away [1] which at least shows some coverage in the national television station for Scotland. I'll have a look for some more before expressing an opinion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonsenseferret (talk • contribs) 17:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- please note, I have moved the page to Runway Theatre Company to provide the correct capitalisation of the name, and I have substantially reworded the article to be remove some of the puffery, adding a new reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonsenseferret (talk • contribs) 18:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- It would have to be a very exceptional community (i.e. Am-Dram) group to be notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 21:55, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.