The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Arguments are made to keep, and the nomination is invalid on its face as it was made by a now CU-confirmed sock account El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 21:53, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pawan Reley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as it lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Many references cited in the article are either promotional or lack credibility. Citations 13, 14, and 15 are press releases, which are inherently self-promotional and do not establish notability. Additionally, citations 16 and 17 are from Amazon, a platform unsuitable for verifying the significance of an individual's achievements. The article also appears promotional in tone, emphasizing awards and achievements without adequate independent verification. A neutral point of view is essential on Wikipedia, and the content here violates this principle. Furthermore, a preliminary Google search fails to uncover substantial, independent coverage of Pawan Reley, further undermining claims of notability. Without credible, independent sources to substantiate the subject's achievements and influence, this article fails to demonstrate that the individual meets the notability requirements for inclusion on Wikipedia. Kriji Sehamati (talk) 14:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and India. Shellwood (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Delhi, Karnataka, and Madhya Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This page meet the criteria under both WP:NJUDGE and the WP:GNG. The article is supported by significant coverage from reliable, independent sources that demonstrate the subject’s notability within the legal field. The inclusion of verifiable information about their legal career, achievements and books further supports their notability. As such, the article fulfills the requirements for both notability guidelines. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Info I wanted to clarify that I have added references related to the book mentioned in the article, including links to where the book is actually available. It is important to include such book references as they provide verifiable sources for the information. The source from Amazon is valid for verifying the book’s availability, and it helps to substantiate the claims made in the article. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Improve your English mate 2A00:23C5:C05E:EC00:F4C0:EA5C:FA3A:BE07 (talk) 21:37, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Sure! But i believe my writing meets the standards of clarity and understanding WP:NONENG. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Thanks to recent improvements.--Ipigott (talk) 16:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.