The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep . The deletion arguments are neatly refuted. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 20:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mirko Kovats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Questionable notability, reads like a cut and paste. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No assertion of notability. No sources; none likely. Claims criminal conviction – should probably be deleted as unsupported statement in BLP. Johnuniq (talk) 04:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. These 2930 news articles would appear to indicate notability, and reading like a cut and paste is a reason to edit, not to delete. I'll start work on getting some sources into the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I note that the German Wikipedia article, of which this appears to be a translation (even preserving the German word order), has plenty of reliable sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I will let you decide on this matter. Actually I tried to help by creating a page to the subject since it is mentioned in the English wikipedia and there are links that lead to a non existant page.If anyone can improve on it he is welcome. --Grandscribe (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I've made a start on copyediting and sourcing - if this guy's not notable then I'm a banana. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. No sources likely?! Hmmm... my eyes are deceiving me... --candle•wicke 23:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.