Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MaxPlay Classic Games Volume 1
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Datel. The article section recommended as a Redirect doesn't exist. Liz Read! Talk! 07:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MaxPlay Classic Games Volume 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article which was formerly BLAR'd into a page where this game compilation was not mentioned. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG from my searches for sources. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- There are references on the talk page which should be sufficient to mention it at Datel, but aren't enough from WP:GNG. That feels like a more useful redirect target even if it's not currently mentioned (note that CodeJunkies redirects to Action Replay currently). --Pokechu22 (talk) 07:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Does not demonstrate sufficient notability and not a good redirect either. MimirIsSmart (talk) 05:41, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Datel#MaxPlay_Classic_Games_Volume_1 (now mentioned there, and a more fitting target than Action Replay. --Pokechu22 (talk) 06:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
From talk page |
|---|
Nintendo Official Magazine had a review of MaxPlay.[1] (Unsurprisingly, it's fairly negative.)
There's also a mention in PSX Extreme which seems more about the disc being hard to dump than the game itself.[2] It's probably not useful to establish notability, but it is interesting to see a reference to Datel discs being weird in a print magazine (I personally know this affects other Datel discs but it doesn't seem to be mentioned there). All other results I could find were in advertisements. There probably is at least one more magazine review in something that hasn't been digitized (e.g. CUBE) but currently there definitely isn't enough for an article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokechu22 (talk • contribs) 01:48, October 12, 2020 (UTC) References
|
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect per Pokechu22 and WP:ATD. I don't see WP:SIGCOV, but this can be mentioned somewhere, as it does verifiably exist. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:01, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or Redirect? Let's also get a consensus on the redirect target too.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)- Redirect to Datel, which can be sourced with the Nintendo Official Magazine article linked above. IgelRM (talk) 02:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.