The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Raider (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:PROF. Boleyn (talk) 12:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 12:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 12:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete. Not enough sources. Sorry. --Fish and karete (talk) 17:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC) Striking sock impersonation !vote[reply]

• Weak keep. I found and added to the article 16 book reviews, spread over multiple books. All but one are edited volumes (which is why my keep is weak) but even so I think it's enough for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:PROF. I see lots of book reviews and articles online. Oddly, he has no social media presence. Bearian (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• withdraw nom per arguments above and David's excellent improvements to this.Boleyn (talk) 05:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.