Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Kuk-bom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 00:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Kuk-bom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for other reason given in discussion toobigtokale (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, please assess additions to the article since nomination. Also, as an aside, for other reason given in discussion doesn't provide any reason to delete an article so it's a discounted opinion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - All 4 article are essentially match reports, 3 of which talk about how some of the players confronted the referee during the match after disagreeing with an on field decision with one of those articles being pay-walled however it appears to be duplicate of the others. None of them address the subject in any detail. Simione001 (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Policy question, I know replies without additional reasoning are weighed less; is it preferred practice to not make them at all? I thought it was ok to do so, sorry if I was off the mark. toobigtokale (talk) 18:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The additional sources are two very similar listicle-type blurbs covering the same three players and published a day apart. Clearly not intellectually independent material, and not SIGCOV either. JoelleJay (talk) 03:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quite the opposite, they are sources (from another country no less) covering the subject and his playing style indepth. North Korea is a journalistically repressed country, so you probably aren't going to find the sources you demand detailing Kim Kuk-bom's dental hygiene and favorite color. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    They are far from in depth. Anyway you just admitted that there aren't any sources and that's exactly why it should be deleted. Simione001 (talk) 21:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.