The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khushaal Susraal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable TV show. Impossible references. Fails WP:GNG 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Query for nominator -- Could you clarify what you mean by impossible references? Insufficient or something else? matt91486 (talk) 15:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Matt91486 There are four. TV listings are useless except to who that it exists at all, and Youtube is deprecated at best. The final one is some sort of un-gossip gossip column. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Okay, I see, thanks. I just wasn't sure what you meant precisely by the phrasing. matt91486 (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.