The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn (Blocked editor). Nakon 01:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keya Seth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Speedy Delete The Article isn't covered significantly in independent reliable sources. Last edition of the article was on 24 September 2014 and that too for placing tags such as 'underlinked' and 'BLP Sources' yet there hasn't been any significant changes to the article. According to me, the article can be deleted and re-created when it gains more coverage in reliable sources. The only sources of the article are Primary Sources, and I may not be that hard to say it may not meet WP:GNG Dormantos (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]

I have changed my vote because the tags were placed on article 2 years ago and yet no changes in content significantly at all. Dormantos (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard nomination by sockpuppet of blocked user. postdlf (talk) 01:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dormantos (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Biography-related deletion discussions. Dormantos (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of any notability  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   14:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.