Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakub Rojek
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jakub Rojek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NMG, WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Appears to be mostly a resume and self-promotional (WP:PROMO). No significant coverage in third party, independently published sources. Geoff | Who, me? 06:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Poland. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:39, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Glane23,
- Nothing in there seems to be self-promotional and all are verifiable facts (awards, compositions, album releases etc.)
- I do not understand why you are suggesting the article to be considered for deletion, when it does exactly what any other artist page does on Wikipedia (lists accomplishments on their resume).
- best,
- Itzek Itzek1952— Note to closing admin: Itzek1952 (talk • contribs) appears to have a close connection with the subject of the article being discussed. (talk) 15:26, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Little to no coverage of this person in media that I can find, most albums are independent releases with only one on a semi-major label. Barely qualifies for NMUSIC. I don't see notability. Has never had a charted single, or any other quality we'd need for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2025 (UTC)