The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 23:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Ozzi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 23:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify Technically passes WP:NFOOTY, since he's made 1 professional appearance for a national-level club, but I would note that NFOOTY is an essay and not binded in policy, and the player section has been superseded anyway. I suggest draftification because said appearance was made only a few months ago, and he's 20, so pretty young in association football terms. Probably a case of WP:TOOSOON right now. 2A02:C7C:2DCE:1F00:383D:B8A4:4B33:8A86 (talk) 10:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NFOOTY doesn't exist, so he doesn't technically pass it. GiantSnowman 19:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already noted that it's been superseded, did you even read what I said? Reading comprehension and general effort seems to be lacking in Afd discussions. If I had a shot for every time I've seen someone say "per nom" or "per [policy]" and nothing else, I would be as drunk as a lord. 2A02:C7C:2DCE:1F00:F1A3:81DD:D733:B4E1 (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article also lacks any general effort. Simione001 (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was blind and couldn't see the 4 references in the article. 2A02:C7C:2DCE:1F00:F1A3:81DD:D733:B4E1 (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:35, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Drafify - not currently notable, but might be in future. GiantSnowman 19:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—Clearly fails WP:GNG, although I am not opposed to draftification given his age. Anwegmann (talk) 20:15, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify - I concur that this appears to be a WP:TOOSOON situation. A full deletion would be appropriate down the road if he fails to meet GNG requirements in the future. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 18:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brisbane_Strikers_FC#Ex-players_currently_playing_senior_football_at_professional/overseas_clubs. I can't see a meeting with WP:SIGCOV Tau Corvi (talk) 21:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  That section has been removed. GiantSnowman 21:40, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.