Hema Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor who does not meet WP:NACTOR, as she has not had any significant roles. She has been a reality show participant, which does not make her notable in itself. There is no significant coverage, and all sources are primary/sponsored/non-independent posts, as well as a couple of trivial mentions of her name, so WP:BASIC isn't met either.

The article was moved from draftspace after it had been declined. bonadea contributions talk 08:17, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, India, and Uttar Pradesh. bonadea contributions talk 08:17, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No indication of notability. No significant coverage. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  As I can see, Internet is full of coverage about HEMA SHARMA, Also the roles in movies and about Reality show qualifies the notability guidelines, also we cant add each and every sources in this, so we have added only 4 to 5 big sources which is accepted by Wikipedia. BTW if everyone thinks that it is not eligible, the article has been moved out to the draft space till we receive the final decission on the same. Okiknowyouknow (talk) 12:15, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Okiknowyouknow: Who is "we"? --bonadea contributions talk 12:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails basic notability requirements. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 11:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources are primary/sponsored/non-independent posts,Please check before commenting @Bonadea Okiknowyouknow (talk) 11:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't accuse your fellow editors, Okiknowyouknow. Here is a source evaluation for the article in its current state: 

Source assessment table prepared by User:Bonadea

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.news18.com/movies/hema-sharma-aka-viral-bhabi-to-join-bigg-boss-18-heres-what-we-know-9074667.html	Churnalism, based on a press release		Trivial mention of her name	✘ No
https://www.indiatvnews.com/entertainment/tv/hema-sharma-aka-viral-bhabhi-eliminated-from-bigg-boss-18-amidst-speculation-2024-10-19-957964		Gossip piece, showing clear signs of being AI generated		✘ No
https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/television/bigg-boss-18s-evicted-contestant-hema-sharma-accepts-she-has-made-many-mistakes-i-married-twice-shouldnt-have-gotten-into-both-marriages-9631559/	Primary source, unclear if it is independent			✘ No
https://www.business-standard.com/entertainment/bigg-boss-season-18-check-complete-list-of-contestants-and-some-surprises-124100700314_1.html			trivial mention in list of contestants	✘ No
https://www.indiatoday.in/television/reality-tv/story/bigg-boss-18-day-13-viral-bhabhi-hema-sharma-evicted-from-salman-khan-show-2620343-2024-10-21	Press release		Trivial mention	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

--bonadea contributions talk 12:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Okiknowyouknow:, please do not move the article to draftspace while the deletion discussion is ongoing. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 12:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Lack of significant coverage, not notable. Buddy Gripple (talk) 14:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Bonadea's source analysis is spot-on, though I wouldn't necessarily object to a simple redirect to Big Boss 18.