The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 17:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glooko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources for NCORP, forbes contribs removed and other original research NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 16:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Shellwood (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Medicine, and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Reference 1 might just barely clear the bar for significant secondary coverage, but ref. 2 is a dead link and the others are routine PR. I was able to find this case study: [1], but I don't know if this would could as significant coverage. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Reference 1 is in-depth but comes under WP:TRADES. Fails WP:NCORP. Gheus (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.