Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethics policy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ethics policy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This topic is already covered at Business ethics and this namespace is too generic to be useful for a redirect. JFHJr (㊟) 03:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Social science. JFHJr (㊟) 03:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge – Instead of removing this article, we could merge it with the business ethics topic. It has some information that doesn't fully overlap with the other article Mangoflies (talk) 04:12, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- There's nothing worth merging. All the sources cited that actually relate to the topic (meaning, not a commentary on Aristotle) are frankly garbage. Remsense ‥ 论 04:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Remsense ‥ 论 04:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge. Self-evident. Hyperbolick (talk) 09:25, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge. It covers business ethics issues so this stub article should be merged with the larger article of business ethics. Knox490 (talk) 11:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge General consensus is saying merge. 3 of 4 people support a merger
- Mangoflies (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)