The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep withdrawn. Thanks for pointing these out. I couldn't find sourcing when doing my search, but this looks good enough for our criteria for artists. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Vander Zaag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable BLP with virtually no independent sourcing. Near BLPPROD level, but has one source in it. Almost entirely unsourced and would qualify for deletion as unsourcable for the majority of the content under WP:DEL7, even if it might meet one of the subject guidelines. Deletion under DEL7 also means that meeting the notability is unlikely, but that would be a secondary reason for deletion in addition to failing the core requirements of WP:V as a BLP. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Sourcing has been added that I did not find on my BEFORE search before making this as a DEL7 nomination of a BLP. I've reviewed the sourcing again, and I do not think it meets the notability requirements, as it is not sourcing from reliable, intellectually independent, secondary sourcing. As such, it should still be deleted. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment doing some quick research, and found these WP:RS Transmediale Festival Inclusion in the collection of the National Gallery of Canada nine exhibitions at Western Front book on history of feminist art in canada her work is represented by Vtape Portuguese encyclopedia of culture--Theredproject (talk) 05:02, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • None of these seem to have any depth of coverage at all... TonyBallioni (talk) 05:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • They are evidence of exhibitions or representation in the case of Vtape. The venue of exhibition confers the notability.--Theredproject (talk) 05:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Multiple holdings in several of the most notable musea in the world including MoMA and the National Gallery of Canada. Mduvekot (talk) 15:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.