The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edgewood (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While it did chart, #130 is hardly notable. WP:NALBUMS states that if an album does chart it MAY be notable (my emphasis), not that it is notable. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Very well aware of what WP:NALBUMS says about "may be" notable—I cite it quite regularly myself. I didn't say that was a guarantee of notability; I said that in combination with its coverage in Pitchfork pointed to it being notable. Sources are out there and could be found. It's a notable topic. Ss112 19:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Ss112 is usually spot on about which music is notable. ChalkDrawings33 (talk) 06:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.