The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) --VersaceSpace 🌃 20:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crawford's Biscuits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources appear to a blog, multiple postal directories, one reference to the Daily Mail but with zero way to go verify, and another blog. valereee (talk) 15:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and England. valereee (talk) 15:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 15:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Mentioned in [1] the A-Z of Leath, Secret Leath and to a lesser extent Export Planning. Oaktree b (talk) 17:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per article improvements and potential for further improvement. Artw (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I've added a few more reliable sources. It's a slight mystery how such a well-known company should have such a flakily-sourced article, as plenty of reliable materials are available. However, notability, as nom should certainly know well, depends on what exists in the world, not on what has been thrown together in the article. This company is beyond doubt notable, as a quick "before" search would have established. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:45, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I was reeling in horror when I saw this nomination. A nation’s grandmothers subsisted on Crawfords biscuits for decades!! A quick search found sources at 1, 2, and 3 as well as many other snippets I can’t view. Mccapra (talk) 21:12, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notability is sufficient as established by references. Coldupnorth (talk) 14:00, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While in no way connected to United Biscuits, I must disclose that yesterday I did eat an entire pack of custard creams as a result of this discussion and subsequent edits. Thank you. Coldupnorth (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Crawfords was a major brand in Scotland for many years, As said above the sources in the article may not have been great, but there will be others out there and it is clearly notable. Dunarc (talk) 22:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I think this is a snow keep (flood of custard cream topping, or something), if anyone would like to do the honours. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - article is much improved Melissa Highton (talk) 17:14, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.