The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birnkrant 616 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Previously deleted student in-house tv series that fails WP:N and WP:V requirements. Ros0709 (talk) 08:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will address concerns raised, but Birnkrant 616 is hardly an in-house television series. It broadcasts to over 5million people on three specific networks (USC Television, LA36, and the OSTN)^[1], has been featured in television festivals

^[2], and written about in notable publications ("Campus Circle", circulation - 30,000, published weekly)^[3][4] In addition, USC Film is widely considered to be the premiere film school in the world,

"In its most recent ranking of graduate film programs, U.S. News in 1997 rated USC tied with New York University for first place, with UCLA a close third. USC boasts that every year since 1973 at least one of its former students has been nominated for an Academy Award." The Los Angeles Times ^[5]

As such, I strongly believe the first student produced sitcom in the school's history is indeed quite notable.

EarlofGowrie (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. First sitcom at a particular school, written about in a campus paper, and shown only on the campus television station (the other networks are merely other places where the campus station broadcasts). None of these scream "notability" to me. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 04:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless sources showing third party notability is forthcoming. Ie. articles not affiliated with the university discussing it. Sounds like a good achievment for the uni, but nothing to show that non-alumni/sudents have any interest in it.Yobmod (talk) 10:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.