Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baw-hair
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 21:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Baw-hair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have looked for quite a while, and have not yet found so much as an example of the phrase, "baw-hair," except on a few forums as a mostly humorous measurement (akin to a smidgen in UK/US English). All the interlang links are to articles on the millimeter, creating a puffery impression that this is a legitimate measure. If anyone can find just one citation for this, I will gracefully concede. Ipatrol (talk) 15:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have a citation from the New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English (2006) confirming it is a Scottish expression meaning a very small measurement -- the width of a pubic hair, to be precise. The dictionary cites Michael Munro's The Patter -- Another Blast (1988): "That [hammer] wis a baw-hair aff stovin in ma skull." The article looks to be someone having a bit of fun, and anyhow, I can't see how it could ever be more than a wp:dicdef, even cited. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. - frankie (talk) 22:50, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. - frankie (talk) 22:50, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is pretty clearly a joke, created by a SPA that I would bet works "in the offshore Oil and Gas industry." Cnilep (talk) 23:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Quite clearly a hoax. As for whether or not the creator works offshore, well, if so then it's good to see them engaged in such a creative intellectual pastime when off duty. (Preceding comment made by one who has worked in the offshore oil and gas industry.) --Deskford (talk) 00:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - Symbol βh? I mean come on, this has to be tongue-in-cheek, right? Linguogeek (talk) 23:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Somebody is having a joke at our expense. And Adoil Descended (talk) 02:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.