The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bearsden. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baljaffray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot fathom any reason why this housing estate is worthy of a wikipedia page. It is located in Bearsden, a town that already has an article devoted to it. magnius (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Bearsden Francium12 (talk) 15:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Bearsden. Google Books and Scholar clearly indicate that this area is part of that town, and the article currently says pretty much all there is to be said about the place. Abductive (reasoning) 16:02, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Bearsden per above. Thryduulf (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The Google Books search linked above shows that well before the housing estate was developed Baljaffray had an existence separate from Bearsden as a limestone and coal mining centre, with sources such as these. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.