The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allan Barty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. Created by WP:SPA User:Slbarty, suggesting WP:COI. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 03:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Definitely a conflict of interest. The article almost meets the guidelines set out by WP:BLPPROD, as it is almost completely unsourced, with the exception of a non-notable blogspot blog. BenLinus1214^talk 03:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Googled him. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 10:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP:MUSICBIO not satisfied, in my opinion. Neither is WP:GNG. I see alot of links to websites like Discogs and AllMusic, but little sources to satisfy the reliable sources guideline. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 04:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.